The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Motorola Moto G52 and vivo Y33e both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches. The Moto G52 prioritizes efficient power management with a Snapdragon 680, while the vivo Y33e opts for a more powerful, though potentially less efficient, Dimensity 700. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Motorola Moto G52 is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 680, built on a 6nm process, offers a more efficient architecture than the vivo Y33e’s Dimensity 700 (7nm), and the 30W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, users focused on raw CPU benchmarks may find the vivo slightly more appealing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 30 | 2022, April 12 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 160.1 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Charcoal Gray, Porcelain White |
| Models | V2166A | XT2221-1, XT2221-2 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 470 EUR |
vivo Y33e
- Faster 30W charging for quicker top-ups
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset for better battery life
- Potentially smoother gaming experience with Adreno 610 GPU
- CPU clock speeds are lower than the vivo Y33e
- Display specs are unknown, potentially average quality
Motorola Moto G52
- Higher CPU clock speeds for faster app launches
- Dimensity 700 offers good performance for the price
- Potentially larger battery capacity (unconfirmed)
- Slower 10W charging is a significant drawback
- Less efficient Dimensity 700 may lead to throttling
- Image processing may not be as refined as the Snapdragon 680
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. However, detailed specs like resolution and refresh rate are missing. The key difference lies in the chipset's ability to drive the display efficiently. The Snapdragon 680's Adreno 610 GPU is optimized for power efficiency, potentially leading to slightly better battery life when viewing content. Without knowing the panel characteristics, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Moto G52's chipset suggests a more optimized visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is challenging. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor and supporting lenses (potentially including a depth or macro sensor). However, the image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 680 is generally regarded as more sophisticated, offering better noise reduction and dynamic range. The vivo Y33e’s Dimensity 700 ISP is capable, but the Snapdragon 680 has a slight edge in image processing capabilities. The absence of OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization, where the Snapdragon’s ISP could further contribute to better results.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G52’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) utilizes a Kryo CPU architecture with a split core configuration – 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A75 and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55. This contrasts with the vivo Y33e’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm) which features 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the Dimensity 700 boasts higher clock speeds on its prime cores, the Snapdragon 680’s 6nm fabrication process provides a significant efficiency advantage. This translates to less heat generation and potentially more sustained performance under load. The Snapdragon 680 is also known for its stable performance, while the Dimensity 700 can sometimes exhibit throttling under prolonged stress. For gaming, the Adreno 610 in the Moto G52 will likely offer a smoother experience than the Mali-G52 MC2 in the vivo Y33e.
Battery Life
The battery capacity is not specified, but the charging wattage is a clear differentiator. The Motorola Moto G52’s 30W wired charging is a significant advantage over the vivo Y33e’s 10W charging. This means the Moto G52 can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. Even if the vivo Y33e has a slightly larger battery capacity, the slower charging speed will likely result in a less convenient user experience. The Snapdragon 680’s efficiency also contributes to better battery life, potentially offsetting any capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y33e if you frequently engage in tasks that benefit from burst CPU performance, like quickly opening multiple apps, and aren't concerned about extended gaming sessions or rapid recharging. Buy the Motorola Moto G52 if you value all-day battery life, faster charging speeds, and a more consistently smooth experience during everyday tasks and light gaming. The Moto G52 is ideal for users who prioritize efficiency and convenience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 700 in the vivo Y33e overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 700, while capable, is built on a 7nm process which can generate more heat under sustained load compared to the Snapdragon 680’s 6nm process. This means the vivo Y33e is more likely to experience thermal throttling during prolonged gaming, potentially leading to reduced performance.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G52 with the 30W charger?
While a precise time requires testing, the Motorola Moto G52’s 30W charging should fully charge the battery in approximately 60-90 minutes, depending on the battery capacity. This is significantly faster than the vivo Y33e’s 10W charging, which could take over 3 hours.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 680 in the Moto G52 powerful enough for popular games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 680, paired with the Adreno 610 GPU, is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with stable frame rates. While it won't deliver the highest graphical fidelity, it provides a playable and enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ Does the vivo Y33e support VoLTE and VoWiFi for improved call quality?
This information is not readily available. However, given the target market, it's likely that both devices support VoLTE (Voice over LTE) for faster call setup and higher quality voice calls. VoWiFi (Voice over Wi-Fi) support is less certain and would depend on carrier compatibility.
