Poco X4 Pro 5G vs. vivo Y33: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Shoppers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage and future-proof 5G support, coupled with incredibly fast 67W charging. While the vivo Y33 is a capable device, it falls behind in processing power and charging speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y33 | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 04 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 04 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.5 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, 70% in 66 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Light Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | V2057 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 270 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y33
- Faster Snapdragon 695 chipset for smoother performance
- Significantly faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3 support
- 5G connectivity for future-proof data speeds
- Potentially higher price point than the vivo Y33
- Software experience (MIUI) can be polarizing
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- More affordable price point
- Reliable MediaTek Helio G80 for everyday tasks
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Slower 18W charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Less powerful processor for demanding applications
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting standard IPS LCD panels. However, detailed display specs like resolution and refresh rate are missing for the vivo Y33. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s display benefits from a larger size (6.67 inches) and likely a higher peak brightness, typical for Xiaomi’s offerings. Without specific data on the Y33’s panel, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or viewing angles, but the X4 Pro 5G likely offers a more vibrant and immersive visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but specifics are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, Xiaomi generally prioritizes camera performance in its Poco line, suggesting the X4 Pro 5G likely has a more capable main sensor and potentially better image processing algorithms. The Y33’s camera system is likely geared towards casual photography, while the X4 Pro 5G aims to deliver more detailed and vibrant images, especially in good lighting conditions. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the X4 Pro 5G, a common feature in Xiaomi’s mid-range phones, would further enhance image quality and video stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) is built on a more efficient process node than the vivo Y33’s MediaTek Helio G80 (12nm). This translates to better thermal management and improved power efficiency for the Poco. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, outperform the Helio G80’s Cortex-A75 cores (2.0 GHz) in both single-core and multi-core benchmarks. This means faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Poco, particularly noticeable in gaming and resource-intensive applications. The 6nm process also suggests less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The vivo Y33’s 18W charging takes 66 minutes to reach 70% and is comparatively slow. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, is a game-changer, reaching 70% in just 22 minutes and a full charge in 41 minutes. This significantly reduces downtime and provides a much more convenient charging experience, especially for users who frequently use their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y33 if you prioritize a simple, dependable smartphone experience and aren't concerned with 5G or demanding applications. It's a solid option for basic communication, social media, and light web browsing. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you want a phone that can handle more intensive tasks, benefit from 5G connectivity, and appreciate significantly faster charging – making it ideal for gamers and power users on a budget.