Realme 9 Pro+ vs vivo Y33: A Deep Dive into Performance, Charging, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 9 Pro+ is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 920 chipset delivers substantially better performance, and the 60W charging dramatically reduces downtime. While the vivo Y33 offers a lower entry price, the performance trade-offs are significant.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y33 | Realme 9 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 04 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 04 | Available. Released 2022, February 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.5 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, 70% in 66 min | 60W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 44 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Light Blue | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue, Free Fire Limited Edition |
| Models | V2057 | RMX3392, RMX3393 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | € 289.90 / $ 390.00 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 495096 (v8), 416031 (v9) GeekBench: 2335 (v5.1) GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y33
- Extremely affordable price point
- Decent battery life for basic usage
- Reliable for everyday tasks
- Significantly slower processor
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely limited camera performance
Realme 9 Pro+
- Powerful Dimensity 920 chipset
- Ultra-fast 60W charging
- Excellent endurance rating (117h)
- Higher price compared to the vivo Y33
- May run warmer under heavy load
- Display details are limited
Display Comparison
The provided data lacks detailed display specifications for the vivo Y33. However, given its market positioning, it likely features a standard 60Hz LCD panel. The Realme 9 Pro+, while lacking specifics like peak brightness, benefits from a contrast ratio described as 'Infinite' (nominal), suggesting a VA panel for deeper blacks. The Realme's more powerful processor will also contribute to smoother scrolling and animations, even if both phones share a similar resolution. The absence of high refresh rate information on the Y33 suggests a less fluid visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the mention of 'Photo/Video', a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 9 Pro+ likely benefits from a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Dimensity 920 chipset, enabling better image processing and potentially superior low-light performance. The Y33’s Helio G80 ISP is less capable. The Realme 9 Pro+ is likely to have a more sophisticated camera system overall, even if megapixel counts are similar, due to the processing power available. The Y33's camera will likely be adequate for casual snapshots, but will struggle with more demanding scenarios.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 9 Pro+'s Mediatek Dimensity 920, fabricated on a 6nm process, offers a significant performance advantage over the vivo Y33’s Mediatek Helio G80 (12nm). The Dimensity 920’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.5 GHz, are architecturally superior to the Y33’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz, resulting in faster application loading and smoother multitasking. The 6nm process also translates to improved thermal efficiency, meaning the 9 Pro+ is less likely to throttle under sustained load. While both phones utilize a 6x Cortex-A55 cluster for efficiency, the Dimensity 920’s overall processing power is substantially higher.
Battery Life
The Realme 9 Pro+’s 60W charging with PD3.0 support is a game-changer, promising a full charge in just 44 minutes (advertised). This is a massive improvement over the vivo Y33’s 18W charging, which takes 66 minutes to reach 70%. While the Y33 may have a larger battery capacity (not specified), the faster charging of the 9 Pro+ minimizes downtime. The Realme 9 Pro+ also boasts an endurance rating of 117 hours, suggesting optimized power management alongside its faster charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y33 if you prioritize extreme affordability and only need a phone for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use. Battery life will be a strength. Buy the Realme 9 Pro+ if you value performance for gaming or demanding apps, and appreciate the convenience of rapid 60W charging. It's the better option for users who want a smoother, more responsive experience.