vivo Y33 vs. OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Shoppers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance boost over the vivo Y33’s Helio G80. The significantly faster 33W charging also makes the Nord CE 2 Lite more convenient for daily use, offsetting its potentially slightly higher price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y33 | OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 04 | 2022, April 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 04 | Available. Released 2022, April 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.5 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, 70% in 66 min | 33W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Light Blue | Black Dusk, Blue Tide |
| Models | V2057 | CPH2381, CPH2409 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 220 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y33
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable for basic smartphone tasks
- Acceptable battery life for light users
- Slower processor and GPU
- Significantly slower charging speed
- Less efficient chipset leading to potential throttling
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 695 5G
- Significantly faster 33W charging
- Better overall performance for gaming and multitasking
- Potentially higher price
- LCD display isn't exceptional
- May not be a significant upgrade for very basic users
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing for the Y33, its market positioning suggests an LCD panel. The Nord CE 2 Lite also utilizes an LCD. The key difference lies in processing power; the Snapdragon 695’s ISP can likely deliver slightly better image processing for display output. However, both will likely offer adequate viewing experiences for everyday use, but don't expect vibrant colors or high peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the main sensors, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Snapdragon 695’s image signal processor (ISP) is generally more capable than the Helio G80’s, offering better noise reduction and dynamic range. The Y33 likely relies heavily on software processing to compensate for its less powerful ISP. Both phones likely include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, but the Nord CE 2 Lite is expected to produce more consistent and detailed images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The inclusion of OIS on the Nord CE 2 Lite (a common feature in this chipset tier) would further enhance image quality.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) is a clear upgrade over the vivo Y33’s MediaTek Helio G80 (12nm). The 6nm process node translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling, meaning sustained performance is higher on the OnePlus. While both CPUs feature an octa-core configuration with similar core arrangements (2x performance cores, 6x efficiency cores), the Snapdragon’s Kryo 660 Gold cores operate at a higher clock speed (2.2 GHz vs 2.0 GHz), providing a tangible performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. The Snapdragon 695 also benefits from a more modern GPU, further widening the performance gap in gaming.
Battery Life
The vivo Y33’s 18W charging is significantly slower than the OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G’s 33W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging speed of the Nord CE 2 Lite is a major convenience factor. The Y33 takes approximately 66 minutes to reach 70% charge, implying a full charge will take well over 90 minutes. The Nord CE 2 Lite can likely achieve a full charge in under an hour. The Snapdragon 695’s superior power efficiency also contributes to potentially longer battery life on the OnePlus, despite potentially having a similar capacity battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y33 if your primary need is a basic, reliable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and you prioritize a lower upfront cost. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G if you want a smoother, more responsive experience, faster charging, and a chipset capable of handling more demanding apps and occasional gaming, even if it means spending a bit more.