The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G and the vivo Y32 both target the budget-conscious smartphone user, but they take different approaches. The Poco X4 Pro 5G prioritizes 5G connectivity and rapid charging, while the vivo Y32 focuses on a streamlined experience with a more power-efficient processor. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers a noticeable performance boost over the Snapdragon 680 in the vivo Y32, and the incredibly fast 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Y32 offers respectable efficiency, the Poco X4 Pro’s advantages outweigh its slightly higher power draw.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 18 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 31 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Light Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | V2158A | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 140 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y32
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Potentially slightly shorter battery life due to more powerful processor
- May be slightly more expensive than the vivo Y32
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 processor for good battery life
- 5W reverse wired charging for accessories
- Likely more affordable price point
- Slower 18W charging
- Limited to 4G connectivity
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing for both. Given the price points, expect both to be 60Hz panels. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s larger size (assumed, based on typical Poco designs) may offer a more immersive viewing experience, but without concrete data, it’s difficult to definitively say which display is superior. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting the budget nature of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or image processing algorithms, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both will rely heavily on software processing to enhance image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to provide significant photographic value. The Poco X4 Pro 5G, given its slightly higher positioning, *may* have a larger main sensor, potentially leading to better low-light performance, but this is speculative.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture and higher clock speeds (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) compared to the vivo Y32’s Snapdragon 680 4G (6nm) (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver). This translates to a tangible performance advantage for the Poco X4 Pro 5G in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The 5G modem in the Poco X4 Pro 5G is a significant advantage for future-proofing, while the Y32 is limited to 4G. RAM configurations are not specified, but faster LPDDR5x RAM in the Poco X4 Pro 5G (likely) would further enhance performance.
Battery Life
Both devices have an endurance rating of 119h, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the difference in charging speeds. However, this rating doesn't account for usage patterns. The vivo Y32’s 18W charging is relatively slow, taking a considerable amount of time to fully charge. In contrast, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging is a game-changer, achieving 70% charge in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. This drastically reduces downtime and makes it much more convenient to top up the battery throughout the day. The Y32 also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a niche feature for charging accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y32 if you prioritize long-term battery life and a consistently smooth, if less powerful, experience for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and social media. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you want faster performance for gaming and multitasking, future-proof 5G connectivity, and the convenience of incredibly fast charging – even if it means slightly shorter battery life between charges.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 695 is a relatively efficient chip. While it will generate heat during prolonged gaming, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s thermal design (details not provided) should be sufficient to prevent significant throttling. Expect some performance reduction after extended play, but it shouldn't be severe.
❓ Is the 5W reverse charging on the vivo Y32 useful for anything beyond earbuds?
The 5W reverse charging is primarily useful for small accessories like wireless earbuds or a smartwatch. It's too slow to effectively charge a smartphone, but it can provide a convenient top-up for low-power devices when you're away from a wall outlet.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 18W charging on the vivo Y32 in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Poco X4 Pro 5G can go from 0% to 70% in about 22 minutes, while the vivo Y32 will take well over an hour to reach the same level. This means you can quickly top up the Poco X4 Pro 5G during a short break, whereas the Y32 requires a much longer charging period.
