vivo Y32 vs Samsung Galaxy F23: A Detailed Comparison

The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y32 and Samsung Galaxy F23 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at an affordable price, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their specs, performance, and overall value to help you make an informed decision.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy F23 edges out the vivo Y32 thanks to its 5G connectivity, slightly better performance from the Snapdragon 750G, and faster charging. While the Y32 is a solid option, the F23 provides a more future-proof and feature-rich experience for a similar price.

PHONES
Phone Names	vivo Y32	Samsung Galaxy F23

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66
5G bands	-	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6
Speed	HSPA, LTE	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
	CDMA2000 1x	-

Launch
Announced	2021, December 18	2022, March 08
Status	Available. Released 2021, December 31	Available. Released 2022, March 16

Body
Build	Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions	164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in)	165.5 x 77 x 8.4 mm (6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	182 g (6.42 oz)	198 g (6.98 oz)

Display
Protection	-	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)	1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density)
Size	6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio)	6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	IPS LCD	TFT LCD, 120Hz

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)	Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)	Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)
GPU	Adreno 610	Adreno 619
OS	Android 11, OriginOS 1.0	Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6

Memory
Card slot	microSDXC	microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal	64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM	128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
	UFS 2.1	-

Main Camera
Dual	13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF 2 MP (macro)	-
Features	LED flash, HDR, panorama	LED flash, panorama, HDR
Single	8 MP, f/1.8	8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Triple	-	50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video	1080p@30fps	4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps

Selfie camera
Single	8 MP, f/1.8	8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	Yes
35mm jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes

Comms
Bluetooth	5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive	5.0, A2DP, LE
NFC	No	Yes
Positioning	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Radio	No	FM radio, recording
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
	-	Virtual Proximity Sensing

Battery
Charging	18W wired 5W reverse wired	25W wired
Type	5000 mAh	Li-Po 5000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Dark Blue, Light Blue	Aqua Blue, Forest Green
Models	V2158A	SM-E236B, SM-E236B/DS
Price	About 140 EUR	About 190 EUR
SAR	-	1.24 W/kg (head)

vivo Y32

Clean and intuitive Funtouch OS
Reverse wired charging
Reliable 4G connectivity
Decent battery life

Less powerful chipset
Slower charging speed
Likely 60Hz display
Camera performance not as strong as F23

Samsung Galaxy F23

5G connectivity
More powerful Snapdragon 750G chipset
Faster 25W charging
Better camera system
90Hz display (likely)

Samsung's One UI can be resource-intensive
Potential for bloatware
Design may be less appealing to some

Display Comparison

Both phones feature a 6.64-inch FHD+ display, offering a decent viewing experience. However, the Galaxy F23 often has a slightly higher refresh rate (90Hz vs Y32's likely 60Hz), resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. Color accuracy and brightness are generally comparable.

Camera Comparison

The Galaxy F23 typically boasts a more versatile camera system, often including a higher resolution main sensor and potentially an ultrawide lens. While the Y32's camera is capable, the F23 generally captures more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in low-light conditions. Video recording capabilities are also typically superior on the F23.

Performance

The Samsung Galaxy F23's Snapdragon 750G 5G chipset is noticeably more powerful than the vivo Y32's Snapdragon 680. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The F23 handles demanding games with ease, while the Y32 might struggle with higher settings.

Battery Life

Both phones pack a substantial 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life. However, the Galaxy F23's 25W fast charging significantly outperforms the Y32's 18W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.

Buying Guide

The vivo Y32 is ideal for users prioritizing a reliable 4G experience, a clean software interface, and potentially reverse charging capabilities. The Samsung Galaxy F23 is a better choice for those wanting 5G connectivity, smoother performance for gaming and multitasking, and faster charging speeds.