The vivo Y32 and Oppo Reno7 5G both target the competitive mid-range smartphone market, but cater to slightly different priorities. The Y32 focuses on affordability and efficiency with its Snapdragon 680, while the Reno7 5G aims for a more balanced experience with the Dimensity 900 and a significantly faster charging solution. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more powerful processor, the Oppo Reno7 5G is the better choice. Its 65W charging, reaching 100% in just 31 minutes, is a game-changer. However, the vivo Y32 offers excellent value for budget-conscious buyers who don't need top-tier performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 18 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 31 | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8 | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8 | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
5W reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Light Blue | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | V2158A | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.4 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9)
GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y32
- Excellent value for money
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 processor
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely less powerful camera system
Oppo Reno7 5G
- 65W SuperVOOC charging (31 min full charge)
- More powerful Dimensity 900 processor
- Brighter and likely higher-quality display
- Higher price point
- Potentially less battery endurance due to more powerful processor
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno7 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 635 nits, compared to the unspecified brightness of the vivo Y32. While both utilize 6nm chipsets, the Reno7’s brighter screen will offer better visibility outdoors. The Reno7’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior panel, likely OLED, providing deeper blacks and more vibrant colors, a feature absent from the Y32’s likely LCD panel. Bezels and color accuracy are not specified for either device, but the Reno7’s positioning suggests a more premium display experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Reno7 5G likely benefits from Oppo’s established camera processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor, though specifics are unavailable. The Y32’s camera system is likely more basic, focusing on providing acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Y32 is unlikely to significantly enhance the photography experience, serving more as a marketing feature than a practical tool. Without sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a camera winner, but the Reno7 5G’s brand reputation suggests a more refined camera experience.
Performance
The Oppo Reno7 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 900, with its 2x Cortex-A78 performance cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, offers a noticeable performance advantage over the vivo Y32’s Snapdragon 680. The Dimensity 900’s architecture is geared towards more demanding tasks, while the Snapdragon 680 prioritizes efficiency. The Y32’s Kryo 265 Gold cores, while clocked at the same 2.4 GHz, are less powerful than the A78 cores. Both chips are fabricated on a 6nm process, but the Dimensity 900’s more advanced core design translates to better multitasking and gaming performance. RAM speed is not specified for either device, but the Reno7’s overall system performance will likely be smoother.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 123 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the vivo Y32’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo Reno7 5G’s 65W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 31 minutes, is a significant advantage over the Y32’s 18W charging. The Y32 does offer 5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories, but the Reno7 5G also supports reverse wired charging, albeit at an unspecified wattage. The Reno7’s faster charging mitigates any potential battery capacity difference, making it more convenient for users who frequently need to recharge.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y32 if you need a reliable, long-lasting phone for everyday tasks and prioritize battery life over raw performance, and are on a tight budget. Buy the Oppo Reno7 5G if you prefer a more responsive experience for gaming and multitasking, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 65W charging, even if it comes at a slightly higher price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 900 in the Reno7 5G tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 900 is generally well-regarded for its thermal management. While it can get warm during extended gaming, Oppo’s cooling solutions typically prevent significant throttling. The 6nm process contributes to improved efficiency, reducing heat generation compared to older chipsets.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on the vivo Y32 actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Unfortunately, 2MP macro cameras are often more of a marketing feature than a practical tool. The low resolution results in images lacking detail and sharpness. While it can capture close-up shots, the quality is unlikely to be impressive, especially in less-than-ideal lighting conditions.
❓ Can the Oppo Reno7 5G reliably maintain 60fps in demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Dimensity 900 and the Reno7 5G’s hardware are capable of maintaining 60fps in PUBG Mobile at medium to high graphics settings. However, achieving consistently high frame rates may require adjusting graphics settings based on individual preferences and gameplay demands.
❓ How long will it realistically take to fully charge the vivo Y32 from 0% using the included 18W charger?
With an 18W charger, a full charge from 0% on the vivo Y32 will likely take around 2 to 2.5 hours, depending on background app activity and battery health. This is considerably slower than the Reno7 5G’s 31-minute charge time.
