vivo Y31s vs OnePlus Nord N10 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord N10 5G emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 690 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge over the Y31s’ Snapdragon 480, and the 30W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Y31s benefits from a newer chip architecture, the Nord N10 5G’s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y31s | OnePlus Nord N10 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 28, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1024/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 12 | 2020, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 15 | Available. Released 2020, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.4 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 163 x 74.7 x 9 mm (6.42 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185.5 g (6.56 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~406 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.49 inches, 101.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619L |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.1 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Red, Gray, Aurora | Midnight Ice |
| Models | V2054A, V2068A | BE2029, BE2025, BE2026, BE2028 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 279579 (v8) GeekBench: 1848 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y31s
- Newer Snapdragon 480 5G chipset architecture
- Potential for future software optimizations
- Competitive price point
- Lower overall performance compared to Snapdragon 690
- Slower 18W charging
- Limited display information
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 690 5G chipset
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Higher display brightness
- Older chipset generation
- May receive fewer software updates long-term
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord N10 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 440 nits and a 1447:1 contrast ratio, offering a more visually vibrant experience than the Y31s, for which display specs are not provided. While the Y31s likely utilizes an IPS LCD panel common in this price bracket, the Nord N10 5G’s higher brightness is crucial for outdoor visibility. The lack of detailed display information for the Y31s suggests it doesn’t offer any standout features in this area.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, OnePlus generally prioritizes camera performance in its Nord series, suggesting the N10 5G likely offers better image quality and more sophisticated image processing. The Y31s, positioned as a more budget-focused device, likely employs a simpler camera system. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely inconsequential, offering minimal benefit in real-world shooting scenarios.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo Y31s features the Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm), while the OnePlus Nord N10 5G uses the SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8nm). The Snapdragon 690, with its Kryo 560 Gold and Silver cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 1.7 GHz respectively, offers a performance advantage over the Y31s’ 2.0 GHz Kryo 460 and 1.8 GHz Kryo 460 configuration. This translates to smoother multitasking and a more responsive experience, particularly in demanding applications. Both utilize an 8nm process, but the 690’s architecture is more refined. The Y31s’ newer chipset *could* benefit from future software optimizations, but currently, the 690 holds the performance lead.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the OnePlus Nord N10 5G’s 30W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Y31s’ 18W charging. This means the N10 5G can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. While both offer all-day battery life, the N10 5G’s faster charging provides a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y31s if you prioritize a phone with the latest Qualcomm chipset architecture and are willing to trade some performance for potential future software optimizations. Buy the OnePlus Nord N10 5G if you value immediate performance gains, faster charging speeds, and a proven track record of software support, even if it means using a slightly older processor generation.