The vivo Y31s and Motorola Moto G 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded budget 5G smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver 5G connectivity without breaking the bank, but they achieve this with different approaches to chipset selection and feature sets. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which phone offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Y31s’ Snapdragon 480, translating to smoother multitasking and a better gaming experience. While both offer similar battery endurance, the Moto G 5G’s slightly faster 20W charging provides a marginal convenience advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 12 | 2020, November 05. Released 2020, December 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 15 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.4 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185.5 g (6.56 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 2GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
2 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Red, Gray, Aurora | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver |
| Models | V2054A, V2068A | - |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1419:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.1 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 312461 (v8)
GeekBench: 1980 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y31s
- Potentially lower price point
- 5G connectivity
- Decent battery endurance
- Less powerful Snapdragon 480 chipset
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
- Lower display brightness (likely)
Motorola Moto G 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 750G chipset
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Faster 20W charging
- Potentially higher price
- Similar battery endurance to the Y31s
- No high refresh rate display
Display Comparison
Both the vivo Y31s and Motorola Moto G 5G share a contrast ratio of 1419:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Moto G 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 484 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Y31s. This higher brightness will be particularly beneficial for outdoor visibility. While both lack high refresh rate panels, the Moto G 5G’s superior brightness gives it an edge for everyday use.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without information on sensor size or aperture, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Snapdragon 750G’s image signal processor (ISP) is more advanced than the 480’s, potentially leading to better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range in the Moto G 5G. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The Motorola Moto G 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm), featuring a more powerful CPU configuration – octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) – compared to the vivo Y31s’ Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) with its octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460). The Kryo 570 cores in the 750G represent a generation leap in architecture, offering improved performance per clock cycle. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Moto G 5G. While both are 8nm chips, the 750G’s architecture provides a clear advantage.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y31s and Motorola Moto G 5G achieve an endurance rating of 131 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Moto G 5G supports 20W wired charging, while the Y31s is limited to 18W. This means the Moto G 5G will likely charge slightly faster, reducing downtime. The similar endurance ratings suggest that despite potential differences in power consumption due to the chipset, both phones are optimized for all-day battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y31s if your primary need is basic 5G connectivity for essential tasks like browsing and social media, and you prioritize a lower initial cost. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G if you value a more responsive user experience, enjoy mobile gaming, or anticipate heavier app usage, and are willing to spend a bit more for the improved performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 480 in the vivo Y31s struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 480 is an entry-level 5G chipset. While it can run PUBG Mobile, you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Motorola Moto G 5G’s Snapdragon 750G offers a significantly better gaming experience with the ability to maintain higher settings and frame rates.
❓ How much faster is the 20W charging on the Moto G 5G compared to the 18W charging on the vivo Y31s?
While the difference isn't massive, the 20W charging on the Moto G 5G will likely shave off around 15-20 minutes from a full 0-100% charge compared to the Y31s. This is a small convenience, but can be noticeable in daily use.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G 5G support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 750G supports carrier aggregation, which allows the phone to combine multiple 5G channels for faster download and upload speeds, provided your carrier supports it. This is a key advantage for maximizing 5G performance.
