The vivo Y31 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they diverge significantly in their core components – specifically, their chipsets and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset offers a substantial performance uplift over the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the vivo Y31, and the 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Y31’s efficiency may appeal to those seeking longer battery life during moderate use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 15 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 15 | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 77 x 8.4 mm (6.54 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Guardian Glass (ion-strengthened) | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1608 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.68 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 38 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Rose Red, Diamond Green | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | V2036, V2036_21 | - |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 1.13 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y31
- More power-efficient 4nm chipset
- Potentially better thermal management under sustained load
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Significantly less powerful CPU and GPU
- Slower charging speed compared to the Redmi Note 10 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Much faster Dimensity 1100 chipset for superior performance
- 67W fast charging for quick top-ups
- Likely better camera system with a higher resolution main sensor
- 6nm process may result in slightly higher power consumption
- Potentially more thermal throttling under extreme load
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, but given the market segment, both likely feature LCD panels with 60-120Hz refresh rates. The Redmi Note 10 Pro is known for its 120Hz display, which the Y31 may lack. Color accuracy and peak brightness will likely be comparable, though the Redmi Note 10 Pro may have a slight edge due to its higher refresh rate and potentially better panel calibration. Bezels are expected to be similar, reflecting the cost-conscious nature of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but both phones likely feature multi-camera setups. The Redmi Note 10 Pro is known for its 108MP main sensor, which is a significant advantage over what is typically found in the Y31’s price bracket. The Dimensity 1100 also offers a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) for improved image processing. While the Y31 may offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, the Redmi Note 10 Pro will likely excel in low-light scenarios and offer more detail and dynamic range. We can assume both will include standard ultra-wide and macro lenses, but the quality of these secondary sensors will likely be similar.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 1100 (6nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz versus the vivo Y31’s two Cortex-A78 cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to significantly faster processing speeds, particularly in demanding applications. While the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) benefits from a smaller fabrication node, potentially improving efficiency, the Dimensity 1100’s superior core count and clock speeds provide a substantial performance advantage. The Redmi Note 10 Pro is better suited for gaming and multitasking. The Y31's 4nm process *could* lead to less thermal throttling under sustained load, but the Dimensity 1100's raw power will likely still outperform it.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, but both phones likely house batteries in the 4500-5000 mAh range. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 67W charging can fully charge the battery in approximately 42 minutes, while the vivo Y31’s 44W charging takes 38 minutes to reach 50%. This means the Redmi Note 10 Pro offers a significantly faster top-up time, reducing downtime. While the Y31’s 4nm chipset may contribute to slightly better battery life during typical use, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s faster charging is a more impactful benefit for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y31 if you prioritize power efficiency and a more modern fabrication process (4nm) for potentially better long-term thermal management, and your usage primarily revolves around everyday tasks like social media, calls, and light browsing. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you demand stronger performance for gaming, multitasking, and content creation, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 67W charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 1100 in the Redmi Note 10 Pro overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 1100 is a powerful chip, it's built on a 6nm process. Some thermal throttling is possible during extended gaming, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro typically incorporates thermal management solutions to mitigate this. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the Y31, with its 4nm process, *might* throttle less, but its lower performance ceiling means it won't sustain high frame rates for as long.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the vivo Y31 slow compared to other phones in this price range?
44W is respectable, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 67W charging is significantly faster. The difference is most noticeable when topping up from low battery levels. While the Y31 will still charge adequately, the Redmi Note 10 Pro offers a much more convenient charging experience.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 offer any advantages in terms of 5G connectivity?
The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 does support 5G, but the Dimensity 1100 also offers robust 5G capabilities. The real-world difference in 5G speeds between the two chipsets is unlikely to be significant, as network conditions play a much larger role.
