The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y31 and Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC represent compelling options, but cater to slightly different priorities. The Y31 leverages Qualcomm's newer, more efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Note 10 Pro NFC relies on the established MediaTek Helio G95. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing efficiency and future-proofing, the vivo Y31 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, built on a 4nm process, offers superior power efficiency and sustained performance compared to the 12nm Helio G95 in the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC. While the Infinix boasts faster NFC functionality, the Y31’s charging speed and chipset architecture provide a more compelling overall package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 15 | 2021, May 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 15 | Available. Released 2021, June 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 77 x 8.4 mm (6.54 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 172.8 x 78.3 x 7.8 mm (6.80 x 3.08 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Guardian Glass (ion-strengthened) | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1608 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.68 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 11, XOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.09" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 38 min
Reverse wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 6500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Rose Red, Diamond Green | Black, Purple, Nordic Secret |
| Models | V2036, V2036_21 | X695C |
| Price | About 150 EUR | - |
| SAR | 1.13 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y31
- More efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset
- Faster 44W charging with 50% in 38 minutes
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially smaller display size
- Camera specs are unknown
Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC
- Likely larger display size
- Established MediaTek Helio G95 platform
- Potentially lower price point
- Less efficient 12nm chipset
- Slower 33W charging
- No reverse charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing, the focus here is on the underlying performance. The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC likely has a larger display, typical of the Note series, but the Y31’s efficiency gains in the chipset will offset any minor display advantages. Color accuracy and brightness are likely similar within this price bracket, with both likely utilizing IPS LCD panels.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor and supporting lenses. The focus should be on image processing capabilities, which are tied to the chipset. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is likely more advanced, offering better noise reduction and dynamic range. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential; image quality will be limited. The aperture and sensor size of the main camera will be the determining factors, but this information is unavailable.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y31’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) is a significant leap forward in efficiency compared to the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm). The 4nm process allows for more transistors in a smaller space, resulting in lower power consumption and reduced heat generation. While the Helio G95’s Cortex-A76 cores have a slightly higher clock speed (2.05 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the Y31’s A78 cores), the architectural advantages and process node of the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 will translate to smoother sustained performance, especially in demanding tasks. The Y31’s CPU configuration (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) provides a more balanced approach, while the G95’s configuration (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) may show short bursts of higher performance but will throttle more quickly.
Battery Life
The vivo Y31’s 44W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s 33W charging. The Y31 can reach 50% charge in just 38 minutes, significantly faster than the Infinix. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s efficiency means the Y31 will likely offer comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery. The Y31 also supports reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Infinix.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y31 if you need a phone that balances performance with excellent battery life and appreciate a more modern chipset architecture. This phone is ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming. Buy the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC if you prioritize NFC functionality for mobile payments and require a slightly larger display, and are willing to trade some efficiency for potentially higher peak GPU performance in short bursts.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G95 in the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The MediaTek Helio G95 is known to generate more heat under sustained load compared to the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. While it can handle gaming, you may experience noticeable throttling and reduced performance during extended gaming sessions. The 12nm process contributes to this thermal limitation.
❓ How much faster is the 44W charging on the vivo Y31 compared to the 33W charging on the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC in real-world use?
The vivo Y31's 44W charging is demonstrably faster. It can reach 50% charge in 38 minutes, while the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC will take considerably longer. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the vivo Y31 powerful enough for popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings with stable frame rates. While it won't deliver the highest graphical fidelity, it provides a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience, especially considering its power efficiency.
❓ Does the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC have a significant advantage in NFC functionality compared to the vivo Y31?
The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC likely has a slightly more robust NFC implementation, potentially offering faster transaction speeds. However, for typical use cases like mobile payments, the difference is unlikely to be noticeable for most users.
