The sub-$300 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, known for its gaming prowess and fast charging, clashes with the vivo Y30g, a more conservatively-specced device aiming for all-day usability. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which phone delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 732G chipset offers significantly better performance, complemented by 33W fast charging. While the vivo Y30g provides a reliable experience, it struggles to compete with the X3 NFC's raw power and charging speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 30 | 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 30 | Available. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191.4 g (6.77 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6768 Helio P65 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1
|
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 62% in 30 min, 100% in 65 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Obsidian Black, Dawn White, Aqua Blue | Cobalt Blue, Shadow Gray |
| Models | V2066BA | M2007J20CG, M2007J20CT |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | € 259.00 |
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | Rp 2,800,000 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | € 229.00 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 119.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 125h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1299:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 283750 (v8)
GeekBench: 1777 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y30g
- More powerful Snapdragon 732G processor
- Faster 33W charging
- 120Hz display for smoother visuals
- Potentially slightly higher price
- Software can be heavily customized (MIUI)
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
- Simpler, more streamlined software experience
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly weaker processor
- Slower 18W charging
- Missing display details (refresh rate, resolution)
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1299:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like resolution, panel type (IPS vs AMOLED), and peak brightness are missing for the vivo Y30g. The Poco X3 NFC’s display, while not cutting-edge, is known for its 120Hz refresh rate, a feature absent in the Y30g, resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. This difference is particularly noticeable during gaming and fast-paced content consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Given the price point, expecting flagship-level camera performance is unrealistic. However, the Poco X3 NFC’s camera system is generally regarded as more versatile, often featuring a higher resolution main sensor (typically 64MP) compared to the Y30g. The absence of details on the Y30g’s sensor size and aperture makes a direct comparison difficult, but the X3 NFC’s reputation for decent image quality in its class gives it an edge. The inclusion of features like night mode and 4K video recording on the X3 NFC further enhance its photographic capabilities.
Performance
The Poco X3 NFC’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8nm) demonstrably outperforms the vivo Y30g’s MediaTek Helio P65 (12nm). The 8nm process node of the Snapdragon is more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance under load. The CPU architecture also favors the Poco: 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold cores versus 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores in the Y30g. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience, especially for gaming. The Y30g will handle everyday tasks, but the X3 NFC offers headroom for more demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Poco X3 NFC boasts a 125-hour endurance rating, indicating solid battery life. Crucially, it supports 33W wired charging, capable of reaching 62% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 65 minutes. The vivo Y30g, with only 18W charging, will take considerably longer to fully charge. While the Y30g’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Poco X3 NFC mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage, providing a more convenient user experience. The X3 NFC’s efficiency gains from the 8nm chipset also contribute to its overall endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y30g if you prioritize a simple, dependable smartphone experience with a focus on basic tasks and moderate usage. It's a good fit for users who don't game heavily or require rapid charging. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC if you're a mobile gamer, a power user, or simply want a phone that can handle demanding applications without breaking a sweat. The faster charging and more capable processor make it a compelling option for those seeking performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Poco X3 NFC's Snapdragon 732G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 732G is specifically designed for gaming. It can comfortably run PUBG Mobile at high settings with stable frame rates. The 120Hz display further enhances the gaming experience by providing smoother visuals.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the vivo Y30g with the 18W charger?
Given the 18W charging speed, a full charge for the vivo Y30g is likely to take between 2.5 to 3.5 hours, depending on the battery capacity. This is significantly slower than the Poco X3 NFC's 65-minute full charge time.
❓ Is the NFC functionality on the Poco X3 NFC reliable for mobile payments?
Yes, the NFC on the Poco X3 NFC is fully functional and reliable for contactless payments using services like Google Pay. It's a key feature for convenient transactions.
❓ What type of storage does the vivo Y30g use, and is it expandable?
While not specified, vivo typically uses eMMC storage in this price range. Expandability via microSD card is likely, but confirmation is needed. The Poco X3 NFC also supports microSD expansion.
