The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the vivo Y30g and Samsung Galaxy A32 aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point. However, subtle differences in their chipsets, displays, and charging capabilities can significantly impact the user experience. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A32 emerges as the slightly better choice. Its significantly brighter display (814 nits) and identical battery endurance rating, coupled with a marginally faster CPU clock speed, provide a more enjoyable and versatile experience, despite the slower 15W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 30 | 2021, February 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 30 | Available. Released 2021, February 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 158.9 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191.4 g (6.77 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6768 Helio P65 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Obsidian Black, Dawn White, Aqua Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Models | V2066BA | SM-A325F, SM-A325F/DS, SM-A325M, SM-A325N |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 124.99 / £ 89.38 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.45 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.3 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 286666 (v8)
GeekBench: 1277 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y30g
- Faster 18W charging for quicker top-ups.
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region).
- Similar CPU performance to the Galaxy A32 for basic tasks.
- Likely lower display brightness, impacting outdoor visibility.
- Limited information on camera specifications.
- Helio P65 is a slightly older chipset.
Samsung Galaxy A32
- Significantly brighter display (814 nits) for better outdoor use.
- Slightly faster CPU clock speed for smoother multitasking.
- Established brand reputation and software support.
- Slower 15W charging.
- May be slightly more expensive than the vivo Y30g.
- Camera performance likely similar to the Y30g.
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A32 boasts a substantial advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 814 nits. This is a critical difference for outdoor visibility, where the vivo Y30g’s display specifications are not provided, implying a lower brightness level. While both displays feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio (a marketing term), the higher brightness of the A32 translates to a more vibrant and readable image in various lighting conditions. The lack of information regarding the Y30g’s panel type (IPS vs. AMOLED) further solidifies the A32’s lead in this category.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing. Given the budget nature of these devices, it’s likely both rely on similar sensor technology. The absence of details suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing tactic, as the image quality from such sensors is typically underwhelming. Without further information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner in the camera department.
Performance
Both devices utilize Mediatek Helio chipsets, but the Samsung Galaxy A32’s Helio G80 (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) offers a slight edge over the vivo Y30g’s Helio P65 (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55). The 100MHz difference in the Cortex-A55 cluster clock speed, while seemingly small, can contribute to smoother multitasking and slightly faster app loading times. Both phones share the same core architecture, meaning the performance gap won’t be massive, but the G80 is generally considered a more capable chipset for light gaming. Neither device is expected to handle demanding titles at high settings.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y30g and Samsung Galaxy A32 achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the vivo Y30g supports 18W wired charging, while the Samsung Galaxy A32 is limited to 15W. This means the Y30g will theoretically charge faster from 0-100%, potentially saving users valuable time. Despite the faster charging, the identical endurance rating suggests the A32’s battery optimization is effective, offsetting the slower charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y30g if you prioritize faster charging (18W) and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A32 if you value a brighter, more visible display for outdoor use, and appreciate a slightly more responsive processor for everyday multitasking and occasional gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Helio G80 in the Samsung Galaxy A32 struggle with demanding games like PUBG?
While the Helio G80 can run PUBG Mobile, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but it's capable of handling casual gaming sessions.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the vivo Y30g a significant advantage over the 15W charging on the Galaxy A32?
Yes, the 18W charging will noticeably reduce the time it takes to fully charge the vivo Y30g. While the difference isn't massive, it can be convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ How does the camera perform in low-light conditions on either the vivo Y30g or Samsung Galaxy A32?
Given the lack of detailed camera specifications, expect both phones to struggle in low-light scenarios. Images will likely exhibit noise and lack detail. Using the flash or a dedicated night mode will be necessary to improve image quality.
❓ Are software updates guaranteed for both the vivo Y30g and Samsung Galaxy A32?
Samsung generally provides more consistent and longer-term software support than vivo. While both phones will likely receive security updates, the Galaxy A32 is more likely to receive major Android version updates.
