vivo Y300t vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and future-proofing, the vivo Y300t emerges as the winner thanks to its more efficient Dimensity 7300 chipset. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s superior battery life and significantly faster 68W charging make it a better choice for those who value longevity and convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y300t | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 31 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 31 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.3 x 8.1 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g or 208 g (7.20 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 40 min Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2445EA | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo Y300t
- More efficient Dimensity 7300 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance due to 4nm process
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Battery life likely inferior to Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Significantly faster 68W charging
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 7030)
- 6nm process less efficient than 4nm
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors. While the vivo Y300t’s display specifications are not provided, the Edge 40 Neo’s panel offers a significant advantage in direct sunlight. The Edge 40 Neo’s display technology is likely OLED, offering excellent contrast and color accuracy, a common feature in this price bracket. Without display specs for the Y300t, it’s difficult to assess its color gamut coverage or viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for both devices are limited. However, the absence of specific sensor information suggests both phones likely employ similar mid-range camera setups. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s inclusion of 'Photo / Video' suggests a focus on versatile camera capabilities, but without knowing sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to assess image quality. The Y300t’s camera performance will likely depend heavily on software processing. Given the focus on value, it’s unlikely either phone features a flagship-level camera system.
Performance
The vivo Y300t’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) offers a clear architectural advantage over the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The smaller 4nm process node generally results in improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing the Y300t to sustain peak performance for longer periods. The Y300t’s CPU configuration (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is identical in core count to the Edge 40 Neo (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), but the 4nm process gives the Y300t an edge in sustained performance. This translates to smoother multitasking and a more responsive gaming experience for the Y300t.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use and an endurance rating of 80 hours. This indicates a highly optimized power management system. While the vivo Y300t’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s endurance is a significant advantage. Furthermore, the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W wired charging is substantially faster than the Y300t’s 44W charging, allowing for a 50% charge in just 15 minutes compared to the Y300t’s 40 minutes. This faster charging is crucial for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300t if you need a phone capable of handling demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and appreciate the benefits of a newer, more efficient processor. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life, quick top-ups with its 68W charging, and a generally well-rounded user experience without pushing the limits of performance.