The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y300 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The Y300 focuses on efficiency with its Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ aims for a more premium experience with the Dimensity 7200 Ultra and blazing-fast 120W charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed and convenience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift, and the 120W charging dramatically reduces downtime. However, the vivo Y300 remains a strong contender for those seeking a more efficient processor and a lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 21 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 26 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.9 x 7.8 mm or 8.0 mm | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g or 190 g (6.63 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 80% in 30 min
Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Carbon Black, Emerald Green | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | V2416 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | About 250 EUR | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y300
- Efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 processor
- 80W fast charging with reverse wired capability
- Potentially lower price point
- Less powerful CPU and GPU compared to the Redmi
- Likely lower display brightness
- Camera system likely less advanced
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Powerful Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (19 minutes to full)
- Bright 1283 nit display
- Potentially higher price
- Dimensity 7200 Ultra may run warmer under sustained load
- May not be as power efficient as the Snapdragon
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1283 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the Y300, which lacks published brightness data but is expected to be lower given its chipset tier. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the Redmi’s higher brightness and potential for higher refresh rates (not specified in the data, but common for this model line) provide a more immersive viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching to conserve battery.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is known for its high-resolution sensors (often 200MP in this series), suggesting a potential advantage in detail capture and low-light performance. The Y300, positioned in a lower price bracket, likely features a more modest camera setup. Image processing algorithms will also play a crucial role, and Xiaomi’s typically prioritize vibrant, social media-ready images, while vivo often aims for more natural color reproduction. The absence of OIS information for both devices means image stabilization will likely rely heavily on software processing.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ leverages the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, featuring a more powerful CPU configuration with 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 cores compared to the vivo Y300’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. This architectural difference, combined with the Dimensity chip’s generally superior GPU performance, will result in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Redmi Note 13 Pro+. Both chips are built on a 4nm process, offering good efficiency, but the Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s more advanced design gives it a clear edge. The Y300’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is still capable for everyday tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s 120W charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is significantly faster than the vivo Y300’s 80W charging, which takes 30 minutes to reach 80% capacity. While the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ achieved an active use score of 10:38h, the Y300’s battery capacity is unknown. However, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s efficiency could potentially offset a smaller battery size, offering comparable real-world battery life. The Redmi’s faster charging is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300 if you need a reliable daily driver with a focus on power efficiency and extended battery life, and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you prioritize performance for gaming and demanding apps, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 120W charging, even if it comes at a slightly higher cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7200 Ultra in the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7200 Ultra is a powerful chip, thermal management is crucial. Xiaomi typically employs effective cooling solutions in their Pro+ models, but sustained gaming at maximum settings may still lead to some throttling. The 4nm process helps mitigate heat, but it's not a guarantee against all thermal issues.
❓ Does the 80W charging on the vivo Y300 support Power Delivery (PD) for charging other devices?
Yes, the vivo Y300 explicitly supports reverse wired charging, indicating it can be used as a power bank for other devices. However, the charging speed for other devices will likely be limited by their PD compatibility and maximum input wattage.
❓ Is the difference in CPU performance between the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 and Dimensity 7200 Ultra noticeable in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the difference will be minimal. However, when multitasking with several apps, editing photos/videos, or playing demanding games, the Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s more powerful cores and GPU will provide a significantly smoother and more responsive experience.
❓ How does the efficiency of the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 impact the overall battery life of the vivo Y300?
The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s 4nm process contributes to excellent power efficiency. This means the Y300 can potentially achieve comparable battery life to the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity, especially with moderate usage patterns.
