The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y300 and Realme 12 Pro+ represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both devices leverage Qualcomm's Snapdragon platform, they target slightly different priorities – the Y300 emphasizing rapid charging and affordability, while the 12 Pro+ aims for a more balanced experience with a brighter display and a more powerful chipset. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a brighter viewing experience, the Realme 12 Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset and 802 nit display offer a noticeable advantage over the vivo Y300, despite the Y300’s impressive 80W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 21 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 26 | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.9 x 7.8 mm or 8.0 mm | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g or 190 g (6.63 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 80% in 30 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Carbon Black, Emerald Green | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | V2416 | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y300
- Extremely fast 80W charging
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset
- Less powerful processor than the Realme 12 Pro+
- Likely dimmer display
- Potentially less refined camera system
Realme 12 Pro+
- More powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 processor
- Brighter 802 nit display
- Longer battery life (13:24h active use)
- Slower charging speed (67W) compared to vivo Y300
- Potentially higher price
- May not be as power efficient as the Y300 in very light usage
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 802 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a common pain point for smartphone users. While the vivo Y300’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be dimmer, potentially impacting usability in direct sunlight. The Realme’s panel likely benefits from a higher contrast ratio as well, contributing to a more vibrant image. We can assume both use LCD panels given the price points, but the Realme’s brightness is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the Realme 12 Pro+’s positioning, it’s reasonable to expect a more sophisticated camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS). The Y300 likely relies on a more basic camera setup to keep costs down. The presence or absence of OIS on the Realme 12 Pro+ would be a significant differentiator, enabling sharper photos and videos, especially in low-light conditions. We can safely assume both phones will include a standard set of lenses, but the image processing capabilities of the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Realme will likely yield superior results.
Performance
The Realme 12 Pro+ is equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (SM7435-AB), featuring four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.40 GHz. This represents a step up in CPU performance compared to the vivo Y300’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (SM4450), which has two Cortex-A78 cores at 2.2 GHz. While both chips are built on a 4nm process for improved efficiency, the 7s Gen 2’s core configuration and higher clock speeds translate to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The 7s Gen 2 also features a more capable Adreno GPU, offering a better gaming experience. The Y300 will be sufficient for casual use, but the 12 Pro+ is the clear winner for demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Realme 12 Pro+ demonstrates impressive battery endurance, achieving 13 hours and 24 minutes of active use. While the vivo Y300’s battery capacity is unknown, the Realme’s longevity suggests a well-optimized combination of hardware and software. The Y300 compensates with its 80W wired charging, capable of reaching 80% charge in just 30 minutes. The Realme 12 Pro+’s 67W charging, while still fast, takes 19 minutes to reach 50%. This means the Y300 offers a quicker top-up, but the Realme 12 Pro+ provides a longer overall runtime between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300 if you absolutely prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and are on a very tight budget. Its 80W charging is a standout feature in this price bracket. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you value a more responsive user experience, a brighter and more visible display in outdoor conditions, and longer battery life during active use. The 12 Pro+ offers a more well-rounded package for those willing to spend a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the vivo Y300 struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is a capable chip for everyday tasks, it will likely require significant graphics settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates in graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact. Expect noticeable frame drops and potential stuttering. The Realme 12 Pro+'s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 offers a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the vivo Y300 compared to the 67W charging on the Realme 12 Pro+ in real-world use?
The vivo Y300's 80W charging will get you to 80% faster – in 30 minutes versus the Realme's time to 50% in 19 minutes. However, the difference in time to 100% is less dramatic. The Realme 12 Pro+'s longer battery life means you may not need to fully charge as often, mitigating the slower charging speed.
❓ Is the Realme 12 Pro+ likely to experience thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is generally well-managed in terms of thermals. While some throttling is possible during prolonged, demanding gaming, the 4nm process node and Realme’s cooling solutions should prevent significant performance degradation. The Y300's Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is less likely to throttle due to its lower power draw.
