The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y300 aims to deliver solid performance at an accessible price point, powered by a Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. Meanwhile, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus enters the fray with a focus on a refined user experience and a more powerful Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro chipset. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a brighter display, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is the better choice. Its Dimensity 7350 Pro offers a noticeable performance uplift, and the 16:34h active use score demonstrates superior endurance. However, the vivo Y300’s 80W charging is a compelling advantage for those who value speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 21 | 2024, July 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 26 | Available. Released 2024, August 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.9 x 7.8 mm or 8.0 mm | 161.7 x 76.3 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g or 190 g (6.63 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.5 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.76" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 80% in 30 min
Reverse wired | 50W wired, 50% in 21 min, 100% in 56 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Carbon Black, Emerald Green | Black, Grey |
| Models | V2416 | A142P |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 269.90 / ₹ 22,599 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y300
- Extremely fast 80W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Efficient 4nm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Less powerful CPU compared to the Dimensity 7350 Pro
- Unknown battery capacity and active use score
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- Superior battery life (16:34h active use)
- Brighter display (1097 nits)
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro chipset
- Slower 50W charging
- Potentially higher price
- No information on PWM dimming frequency
Display Comparison
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1097 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the vivo Y300, whose brightness is not specified. While the Y300’s panel technology isn’t detailed, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s brightness advantage is a clear win for users who consume content on the go. The absence of LTPO on either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rates to conserve power, but the brighter panel on the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus will likely be more impactful in real-world usage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the vivo Y300, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus likely benefits from a more sophisticated image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Dimensity 7350 Pro. The focus should be on the main sensor quality and image processing algorithms. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests both may rely heavily on software stabilization, potentially impacting low-light performance. We can assume the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus will offer a more refined camera experience due to its more powerful chipset.
Performance
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro, with its 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 cores, represents a substantial performance leap over the vivo Y300’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78). The A715 cores are architecturally more advanced than the A78, offering improved IPC (Instructions Per Clock). Both chipsets are fabricated on a 4nm process, ensuring good efficiency, but the Dimensity 7350 Pro’s higher clock speeds and core design will result in smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. While the Y300 is adequate for everyday tasks, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is better equipped for demanding applications and gaming.
Battery Life
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 16:34h of active use. While the vivo Y300’s battery capacity is unknown, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s endurance is a significant advantage. The Y300 compensates with 80W wired charging, capable of reaching 80% charge in just 30 minutes. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s 50W charging, while slower, still manages 50% in 21 minutes and 100% in 56 minutes. The trade-off is clear: the Y300 prioritizes charging speed, while the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus prioritizes overall battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300 if you prioritize extremely fast charging and are on a tighter budget, accepting a slight performance trade-off. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and need a quick power boost. Buy the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus if you value sustained performance, a brighter and more vibrant display, and longer battery life, even if it means slightly slower charging speeds. This phone suits users who engage in media consumption, gaming, or demanding multitasking.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the vivo Y300 struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is capable of running Genshin Impact, users should expect to lower graphics settings to achieve a playable frame rate. The Dimensity 7350 Pro in the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus offers a more comfortable gaming experience with higher settings and smoother performance.
❓ How does the 50W charging on the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus compare to other phones with similar wattage?
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s 50W charging is relatively standard for its price range. While not as fast as the vivo Y300’s 80W, it’s still efficient, reaching 50% charge in 21 minutes. The charging speed is also optimized by Nothing’s software to prioritize battery health.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on the vivo Y300 a major concern?
Yes, the absence of information regarding sensor size, aperture, and OIS makes it difficult to assess the Y300’s camera capabilities. In this price segment, camera performance is often a key differentiator, and the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus likely has an advantage due to its more powerful ISP.
