vivo Y300 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and rapid charging, the vivo Y300 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, built on a 4nm process, offers a more efficient architecture than the 6nm Dimensity 7030, translating to better thermal management and potentially longer gaming sessions. While the Edge 40 Neo boasts impressive battery endurance, the Y300's 80W charging significantly reduces downtime.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y300 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 21 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 26 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.9 x 7.8 mm or 8.0 mm | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g or 190 g (6.63 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 80% in 30 min Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Carbon Black, Emerald Green | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2416 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y300
- Faster 80W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset for better thermal management.
- Potentially better sustained performance due to improved efficiency.
- Display specifications are unknown, potentially lacking brightness and color accuracy.
- Camera details are missing, making image quality assessment difficult.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Brighter 1073 nit display for excellent outdoor visibility.
- Impressive battery life with 10:28h active use.
- 68W fast charging provides a reasonable top-up speed.
- 6nm Dimensity 7030 may throttle under sustained load.
- Camera specifications are limited, hindering detailed analysis.
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo distinguishes itself with a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits, offering excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the vivo Y300’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be lower, making the Edge 40 Neo the better choice for outdoor use. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel technology is also likely to be OLED, offering superior contrast and color accuracy compared to the Y300’s likely LCD panel. However, without knowing the Y300’s refresh rate, it’s difficult to assess smoothness.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications beyond 'Photo / Video' are absent for the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. However, Motorola typically focuses on computational photography. The vivo Y300’s camera details are also missing. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will feature a multi-camera setup, but image quality will heavily depend on software processing and sensor capabilities, which remain unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) features a CPU with 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The vivo Y300’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) has 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the Dimensity 7030 has slightly higher clocked A78 cores, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s 4nm fabrication process provides a significant advantage in power efficiency and thermal performance. This means the Y300 is less likely to throttle under sustained load, offering more consistent performance during gaming or video editing. The 4nm node also suggests lower power consumption for similar tasks.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts an impressive active use score of 10:28h and an endurance rating of 80 hours, indicating excellent battery life. However, the vivo Y300 compensates with significantly faster charging: 80W wired, capable of reaching 80% charge in just 30 minutes. The Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging, while still fast, takes longer to reach 50% (15 minutes). This difference in charging speed is crucial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The Y300’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a potentially smaller battery capacity (which is not specified).
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300 if you need a phone that can handle demanding apps and moderate gaming without significant throttling, and if minimizing charging time is a priority. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life and a brighter display, and are willing to trade some peak performance for extended usage between charges. The Edge 40 Neo is ideal for media consumption and everyday tasks.