vivo Y300 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power

The vivo Y300 Pro+ and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take different approaches to achieving this goal – vivo focusing on a newer Snapdragon chipset and versatile charging, while Xiaomi prioritizes blazing-fast 120W charging and a proven Dimensity platform. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and established performance, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is the better choice. Its 120W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Dimensity 1080 offers a solid, well-optimized experience. However, the vivo Y300 Pro+’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 offers potential efficiency gains and a newer architecture.

PHONES
Phone Names	vivo Y300 Pro+	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
3G bands	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48	1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China
5G bands	1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA	1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
	-	1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China

Launch
Announced	March 31	2022, October 27
Status	Available. Released 2025, April 03	Available. Released 2022, November 01

Body
Build	-	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back
Dimensions	163.4 x 76.4 x 7.9 mm (6.43 x 3.01 x 0.31 in)	162.9 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)
Weight	199 g (7.02 oz)	208.4 g (7.34 oz)
	-	IP53, dust and splash resistant

Display
Protection	-	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size	6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio)	6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (typ), 1300 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak)	OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520)	Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm)	Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
GPU	Adreno 810	Mali-G68 MC4
OS	Android 15, OriginOS 5	Android 12, MIUI 13

Memory
Card slot	No	No
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM	256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
	-	UFS 2.2

Main Camera
Dual	50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens	-
Features	LED flash, HDR, panorama	Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Triple	-	200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps

Selfie camera
Features	-	HDR
Single	32 MP, f/2.0, (wide)	16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30/60fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	-	Yes
35mm jack	No	-
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes, with stereo speakers
	-	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive	5.2, A2DP, LE
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS	GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1)
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass

Battery
Charging	90W wired, 55W PPS, 44W UFCS 7.5W reverse wired	120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min (advertised)
Type	Si/C Li-Ion 7300 mAh	Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable

Misc
Colors	Black, Silver, Pink	Arctic White, Iceberg Blue, Obsidian Black, Trend edition
Models	V2456A	22101316UCP, 22101316UG
Price	About 230 EUR	$ 348.00 / £ 439.00 / € 399.00 / ₹ 29,949

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 88h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-26.7 LUFS (Good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 498710 (v9) GeekBench: 2208 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo Y300 Pro+

Newer Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset
4nm process for potentially better efficiency
Versatile charging support (90W, 55W PPS, 44W UFCS)

Lower peak CPU clock speeds
Missing display specifications
Camera specs currently unknown

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+

Ultra-fast 120W charging
Proven Dimensity 1080 performance
Reported 88-hour endurance rating

6nm process may be less efficient
Display specifications limited to contrast ratio
Camera specs beyond presence are unknown

Display Comparison

The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ boasts an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting a high-quality AMOLED panel, though specific peak brightness and color accuracy data are missing. The Y300 Pro+’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given the price bracket, both are likely to utilize AMOLED technology. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests standard refresh rate management, potentially impacting battery life during dynamic content viewing.

Camera Comparison

Detailed camera specifications beyond the presence of a camera on the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ are unavailable. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+’s camera system is likely to be a key selling point, but without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a thorough comparison is impossible. The Y300 Pro+’s camera specs are also missing. We can assume both devices will include multiple lenses, but the quality will depend heavily on the primary sensor and image processing algorithms. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses in this segment suggests both devices may include one, but their utility is limited.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo Y300 Pro+ utilizes the Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4nm), while the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ features the MediaTek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6nm). The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3’s 4nm process offers a theoretical advantage in power efficiency compared to the Dimensity 1080’s 6nm node, potentially leading to cooler operation and longer battery life under sustained load. However, the Dimensity 1080’s Cortex-A78 cores (2x2.6 GHz) are clocked higher than the Y300 Pro+'s Cortex-A720 cores (1x2.5 GHz, 3x2.4 GHz), suggesting potentially stronger peak CPU performance. The Y300 Pro+’s CPU configuration, with a mix of A720 and A520 cores, aims for a balance between performance and efficiency, while the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ relies on a more traditional A78/A55 pairing.

Battery Life

The Redmi Note 12 Pro+’s standout feature is its 120W wired charging, advertised to reach 100% in just 19 minutes. This is significantly faster than the vivo Y300 Pro+’s 90W wired charging, even with the inclusion of 55W PPS and 44W UFCS support. While the Y300 Pro+ offers reverse wired charging at 7.5W, the Redmi Note 12 Pro+’s battery capacity is unknown. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ boasts an endurance rating of 88 hours, suggesting a well-optimized power management system. The Y300 Pro+'s battery capacity is also unknown, making a direct comparison of total runtime difficult.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo Y300 Pro+ if you prioritize a newer chipset architecture and potentially better long-term software support, and value the flexibility of multiple fast charging standards (90W, 55W PPS, 44W UFCS). Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds, and prefer a device with a proven track record of performance and a reported 88-hour endurance rating.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 in the vivo Y300 Pro+ offer a noticeable gaming performance improvement over the Dimensity 1080?

While the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 is newer, the Dimensity 1080 is a well-optimized chipset for gaming. The actual performance difference will depend on the specific game and optimization. The 7s Gen 3’s efficiency may lead to slightly more sustained performance due to better thermal management, but the Dimensity 1080’s higher clock speeds could provide a short-term advantage in some titles.

❓ How does the 90W charging on the vivo Y300 Pro+ compare to the 120W charging on the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ in real-world usage?

The Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s 120W charging is demonstrably faster, reaching 100% in approximately 19 minutes (advertised). The Y300 Pro+'s 90W charging will take longer, though the inclusion of PPS and UFCS may offer optimized charging with compatible accessories. For users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly, the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is the clear winner.

❓ Is the 88-hour endurance rating of the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ realistic for typical usage?

Endurance ratings are based on specific usage patterns and are often optimistic. However, the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s reported 88-hour endurance suggests a well-optimized power management system and a potentially large battery capacity. Real-world battery life will vary depending on your usage, but it's likely to be above average for a mid-range device.