vivo Y300 Pro+ vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing rapid charging and peak performance in demanding tasks, the vivo Y300 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its 90W charging and Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset offer a significant advantage. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo excels in battery life and provides a more holistic user experience for everyday tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y300 Pro+ | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 31 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 03 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 76.4 x 7.9 mm (6.43 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (typ), 1300 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 55W PPS, 44W UFCS 7.5W reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Pink | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2456A | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo Y300 Pro+
- Significantly faster 90W charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4nm)
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Battery capacity not specified
- Limited camera details available
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- High peak display brightness (1073 nits)
- Balanced feature set
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 7030, 6nm)
- Slower charging speed (68W)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits, a strong figure ensuring excellent visibility even outdoors. While the vivo Y300 Pro+’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume it falls within a similar range given its market positioning. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely utilizes OLED technology, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. Without knowing the panel type or refresh rate of the Y300 Pro+, it’s difficult to assess its overall display quality beyond brightness, but the Edge 40 Neo has a clear advantage in measured brightness.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for both devices are limited. However, the focus should be on the main sensor capabilities. Without knowing the sensor size or aperture of the Y300 Pro+, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The Edge 40 Neo’s camera system is described as offering both photo and video capabilities, but lacks specific details. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device would be a significant advantage, particularly for video recording. It's safe to assume both phones will include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, but image quality will ultimately depend on sensor size, lens quality, and image processing algorithms.
Performance
The vivo Y300 Pro+ is equipped with the Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a prime Cortex-A720 core clocked at 2.5 GHz. This 4nm process node provides superior power efficiency compared to the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The Dimensity 7030 utilizes older Cortex-A78 cores at 2.5 GHz, and while still capable, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3’s newer architecture and smaller process node translate to better sustained performance and thermal management. The Y300 Pro+ is likely to exhibit less throttling during extended gaming sessions. However, the Edge 40 Neo’s CPU configuration may offer better multi-core performance in certain workloads.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 10:28h and an endurance rating of 80h. This suggests excellent power management and a well-optimized software experience. The vivo Y300 Pro+’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 90W wired charging (with 55W PPS and 44W UFCS support) is a standout feature. This allows for incredibly fast charging times, potentially reaching a full charge in under 40 minutes. While the Edge 40 Neo offers 68W charging with a 50% charge in 15 minutes, the Y300 Pro+’s charging speed is significantly faster. The Y300 Pro+ also offers 7.5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Edge 40 Neo.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300 Pro+ if you need the fastest possible charging speeds, frequently engage in resource-intensive applications like gaming or video editing, and value raw processing power. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life, a more streamlined software experience, and a balanced feature set for everyday use, and aren't as concerned with pushing the absolute limits of performance.