The vivo Y300 Pro+ and Honor X9b represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both leverage Qualcomm's Snapdragon platform, but at different tiers. This comparison dissects the key differences – from processing power and charging speeds to overall value – to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and rapid charging, the vivo Y300 Pro+ emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset delivers a noticeable performance uplift over the Honor X9b’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, and the 90W charging is a game-changer. However, the Honor X9b remains a solid contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | March 31 | 2023, October 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 03 | Available. Released 2023, October |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 76.4 x 7.9 mm (6.43 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (typ), 1300 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 13, Magic OS 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 55W PPS, 44W UFCS
7.5W reverse wired | 35W wired
Reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7300 mAh | Li-Po 5800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Pink | Sunrise Orange, Midnight Black, Emerald Green |
| Models | V2456A | ALI-NX1 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 970 EUR |
vivo Y300 Pro+
- Significantly faster 90W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset
- Advanced charging protocols (PPS, UFCS)
- Potentially higher price point
- No display specifications available for comparison
Honor X9b
- More affordable price
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Potentially more durable build (based on Honor's history)
- Slower 35W charging
- Less powerful Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset
- Limited performance for demanding games
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Y300 Pro+'s positioning, it likely features a higher refresh rate panel than the X9b. The Honor X9b, historically, focuses on durability, so may have a more robust glass covering. Color accuracy will likely be similar, leaning towards vibrant, consumer-friendly profiles typical of both brands.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests the Y300 Pro+ will have a more capable image signal processor (ISP), leading to better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 supports more advanced camera features. The Honor X9b will likely focus on providing acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, but may struggle in low-light scenarios compared to the Y300 Pro+.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y300 Pro+ boasts the Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4nm), featuring a prime Cortex-A720 core clocked at 2.5 GHz. This is a significant step up from the Honor X9b’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) with its Cortex-A78 cores peaking at 2.2 GHz. The 7s Gen 3’s architecture, including the more modern Cortex-A720 cores, translates to better single-core and multi-core performance, particularly noticeable in demanding applications and gaming. While both are 4nm chips, the architectural improvements in the 7s Gen 3 provide a clear advantage. The Y300 Pro+ will handle multitasking and graphically intensive games with greater ease.
Battery Life
The vivo Y300 Pro+’s 90W wired charging is a standout feature, drastically reducing charging times compared to the Honor X9b’s 35W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The Y300 Pro+ also supports 55W PPS and 44W UFCS, offering broader compatibility with chargers, and 7.5W reverse wired charging for accessories. The Honor X9b offers reverse wired charging, but at a lower wattage, making the Y300 Pro+ the clear winner for charging convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300 Pro+ if you need a phone capable of handling demanding apps, enjoy mobile gaming, and value incredibly fast charging. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 provides a smoother experience and the 90W charging minimizes downtime. Buy the Honor X9b if you prioritize a lower price point and are content with a more basic level of performance for everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light communication. It’s a practical choice for users who don’t push their phones to the limit.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the Honor X9b struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is likely to struggle with Genshin Impact and similar titles at higher settings. You’ll likely need to reduce graphics settings significantly to achieve playable frame rates. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 in the Y300 Pro+ offers a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ How long does it realistically take to charge the vivo Y300 Pro+ from 0% to 100% with the 90W charger?
With 90W charging, the vivo Y300 Pro+ should be able to charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 30-45 minutes, depending on battery capacity and background processes. This is a substantial time saving compared to the Honor X9b’s 35W charging.
❓ Does the Honor X9b support 5G connectivity?
While not explicitly stated, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 *does* support 5G connectivity. However, 5G availability will depend on your carrier and region.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture between the Cortex-A78 and Cortex-A720 cores significant for everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing and social media, the difference may not be immediately noticeable. However, the Cortex-A720 cores in the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 offer improved efficiency and performance in more demanding applications, resulting in a snappier overall experience.
