vivo Y300 Pro vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a vibrant viewing experience, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the stronger choice. Its impressive 10:28 hour active use battery life and 1073 nit peak brightness outweigh the vivo Y300 Pro’s faster charging, especially given the relatively similar performance profiles.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y300 Pro | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 05 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 14 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 76.4 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 3.01 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 5000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Ocean Blue, Titanium, White | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2410A | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo Y300 Pro
- Extremely fast 80W wired charging
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Snapdragon chipset offers good all-around performance
- Likely shorter battery life compared to the Edge 40 Neo
- Display brightness likely lower than the Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Bright and vibrant 1073 nit display
- Dimensity 7030 offers strong performance and efficiency
- Slower 68W charging compared to the Y300 Pro
- May not be as readily available in all markets
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors and in brightly lit environments compared to the vivo Y300 Pro, which lacks published brightness data. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Edge 40 Neo’s higher peak brightness is a tangible benefit. We expect the Y300 Pro to have a standard refresh rate, while the Edge 40 Neo’s panel is likely to offer a smoother experience, though this is not confirmed in the provided data.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn’t offer sufficient detail for a comprehensive camera comparison. Both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, but without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, it’s difficult to assess their capabilities. We can assume the Edge 40 Neo, given Motorola’s recent focus, will prioritize computational photography and natural-looking images. The Y300 Pro’s camera performance will likely be more dependent on the quality of its primary sensor. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality.
Performance
Both phones employ octa-core CPUs, but their underlying architectures differ. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 features 2x Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, while the vivo Y300 Pro’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 utilizes 4x Cortex-A78 cores at 2.2 GHz. The Dimensity 7030, built on a 6nm process, generally offers a slight edge in sustained performance and efficiency over the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1’s 4nm node due to its core configuration. However, the Snapdragon’s 4nm process should contribute to better thermal management under prolonged load. Both devices are expected to handle everyday tasks and moderate gaming without issue, but the Edge 40 Neo may exhibit slightly smoother performance in demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo clearly excels in battery performance, achieving an impressive 10:28 hours of active use. While the Y300 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s endurance rating of 80 hours suggests a substantial battery. The Y300 Pro compensates with 80W wired charging, significantly faster than the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W, capable of reaching 50% charge in 15 minutes. However, the Edge 40 Neo’s longer battery life reduces the need for frequent top-ups, making it more convenient for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300 Pro if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds and frequently find yourself needing to top up your phone throughout the day. Its 80W wired charging is a significant advantage. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value all-day battery life, a brighter and more visible display in sunlight, and a more balanced overall package. It’s the better option for users who prioritize endurance and usability.