The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, with brands like vivo and Tecno vying for dominance. Both the vivo Y300 Plus and Tecno Spark 10 Pro aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches. The Y300 Plus prioritizes 5G connectivity with a Snapdragon chipset, while the Spark 10 Pro focuses on a balanced feature set with a MediaTek Helio processor. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and smoother performance, the vivo Y300 Plus is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers a significant performance advantage over the Tecno Spark 10 Pro’s Helio G88, despite the latter having comparable battery endurance. The faster charging also adds to the Y300 Plus’s appeal.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 16 | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 16 | Available. Released 2023, March 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back or glass back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 74.9 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 168.4 x 76.2 x 8.4 mm (6.63 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 183 g (6.07 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.3 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, HIOS 12.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
other unspecified cameras |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silk black, Silk green | Starry Black, Pearl White |
| Models | V2422 | KI7 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | £ 245.74 |
| SAR | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.91 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 131h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1991:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 249938 (v9)
GeekBench: 1358 (v5.1), 1376 (v6)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y300 Plus
- 5G Connectivity for faster data speeds
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Faster 44W charging with reverse wired capability
- Display specifications are less detailed
- Camera specs are not readily available
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
- Brighter display (521 nits)
- Comparable battery endurance
- Potentially more aggressive camera marketing
- Less powerful and less efficient Helio G88 chipset
- Slower 18W charging
- No 5G connectivity
Display Comparison
Both the vivo Y300 Plus and Tecno Spark 10 Pro share a contrast ratio of 1991:1, suggesting similar image quality in terms of blacks and whites. However, the Tecno Spark 10 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 521 nits, offering a noticeably brighter viewing experience, especially outdoors. While both manufacturers state the same contrast ratio, real-world performance can vary due to panel calibration. The lack of information regarding panel type (IPS vs AMOLED) and refresh rate for the Y300 Plus leaves the Spark 10 Pro with a slight edge in display clarity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of details suggests both phones likely employ budget-friendly camera modules. The focus should be on image processing algorithms, which are proprietary to each brand. The Tecno Spark 10 Pro’s marketing often emphasizes camera features, but without concrete specs, it’s hard to assess its advantage. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Spark 10 Pro is unlikely to significantly enhance the photography experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y300 Plus utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, fabricated on a more efficient 6nm process. This translates to better thermal management and power efficiency compared to the Tecno Spark 10 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G88, built on a 12nm node. The Snapdragon 695’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver – provides a performance boost over the Helio G88’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. This difference is particularly noticeable in multitasking and graphically intensive applications. While both have 6 cores running at 1.8GHz, the architecture of the Snapdragon cores is more modern and efficient.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 131 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the vivo Y300 Plus compensates for any potential battery capacity differences with its significantly faster 44W wired charging, including reverse wired charging. This allows for a much quicker 0-100% charge time compared to the Tecno Spark 10 Pro’s 18W charging. The faster charging is a significant convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300 Plus if you need 5G connectivity for faster data speeds and anticipate using demanding apps or light gaming. Its Snapdragon 695 provides a more responsive experience. Buy the Tecno Spark 10 Pro if you prioritize a balanced feature set and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like calling, texting, and social media, and don't require 5G.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the vivo Y300 Plus handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but it offers a smoother experience than the Helio G88, especially during prolonged gaming sessions due to its superior thermal efficiency.
❓ Does the Tecno Spark 10 Pro support VoLTE and VoWiFi for improved call quality?
While not explicitly stated, Tecno Spark phones generally support VoLTE (Voice over LTE) and VoWiFi (Voice over Wi-Fi) depending on carrier compatibility. It's best to check with your mobile carrier to confirm support in your region.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the vivo Y300 Plus with the 44W charger?
With 44W charging, the vivo Y300 Plus should fully charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 60-75 minutes, significantly faster than the Tecno Spark 10 Pro's 18W charging.
❓ Is the Helio G88 in the Tecno Spark 10 Pro sufficient for everyday tasks like social media and browsing?
Yes, the Helio G88 is perfectly adequate for everyday tasks such as social media, web browsing, and messaging. It won't excel at demanding applications, but it provides a smooth and responsive experience for basic usage.
