The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y300 Plus, powered by the Snapdragon 695 5G, aims to deliver 5G connectivity and solid performance. Meanwhile, Samsung’s Galaxy A24 4G focuses on a bright display and a familiar user experience. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing 5G connectivity and faster charging, the vivo Y300 Plus is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 offers a slight performance edge and 44W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G’s brighter display is a compelling advantage for media consumption.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 16 | 2023, April 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 16 | Available. Released 2023, May 05 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back or glass back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 74.9 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3 mm (6.38 x 3.06 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 183 g (6.07 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silk black, Silk green | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red |
| Models | V2422 | SM-A245F, SM-A245F/DS, SM-A245F/DSN, SM-A245M, SM-A245M/DS, SM-A245N |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.91 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.41 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y300 Plus
- Faster 44W charging for quicker top-ups
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Potentially better sustained performance with Snapdragon 695
- Display brightness likely lower than Samsung A24
- Camera specs are currently unknown
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
- Brighter 1012 nit display for excellent outdoor visibility
- Samsung’s One UI software experience
- Good battery endurance (141h rating)
- Slower 25W charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1012 nits. This is a substantial advantage for outdoor visibility, making it ideal for users who frequently use their phones in direct sunlight. While the vivo Y300 Plus’s display specs are not provided, Samsung’s panel offers a superior viewing experience in bright conditions. The A24’s panel technology and resolution (likely FHD+) contribute to sharper visuals compared to what is typically found in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs beyond 'Photo/Video' are missing for the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G, but Samsung typically emphasizes image processing. The vivo Y300 Plus’s camera capabilities are also not detailed. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the presence of a dedicated 5G modem in the Y300 Plus might allow for faster uploads of photos and videos. We can assume both phones will feature a multi-camera setup, but image quality will heavily depend on software optimization and sensor quality, which are currently unknown.
Performance
Both the vivo Y300 Plus and Samsung Galaxy A24 4G utilize 6nm process nodes, indicating similar power efficiency. However, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G in the Y300 Plus features Kryo 660 Gold cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, offering a slight architectural advantage over the Galaxy A24’s MediaTek Helio G99 with its Cortex-A76 cores also at 2.2 GHz. The Snapdragon’s integrated 5G modem is a key differentiator. While both CPUs have an octa-core configuration, the Snapdragon’s architecture generally translates to better sustained performance in demanding tasks. The Y300 Plus is likely to handle multitasking and moderate gaming slightly more smoothly.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G has an endurance rating of 141 hours, suggesting good battery life. However, the vivo Y300 Plus counters with significantly faster 44W wired charging, compared to the A24’s 25W. This means the Y300 Plus can replenish its battery much quicker, minimizing downtime. While the A24’s endurance rating indicates it can last a full day on a single charge, the Y300 Plus’s faster charging is a significant convenience factor, especially for users who frequently run out of battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300 Plus if you need 5G access for faster data speeds, value quicker charging times, and anticipate moderate gaming. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G if you prioritize a vibrant, easily visible display, prefer Samsung’s One UI software, and don’t require 5G connectivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Helio G99 in the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Helio G99 is a capable chip, but it's designed for mid-range gaming. While it can run PUBG and Call of Duty, you may need to lower graphics settings to achieve consistently smooth frame rates. The Snapdragon 695 in the vivo Y300 Plus may offer slightly better sustained performance during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the vivo Y300 Plus with the 44W charger?
With 44W charging, the vivo Y300 Plus should be able to charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 60-75 minutes, depending on battery capacity. This is significantly faster than the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G’s 25W charging, which will likely take over 90 minutes.
❓ Is the lack of 5G on the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G a significant drawback in 2024?
It depends on your location and carrier. If 5G coverage is readily available in your area and you have a 5G data plan, the lack of 5G on the A24 4G will limit your potential download and upload speeds. However, if 5G is not widely available or you don't have a 5G plan, it's less of a concern.
