The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y300 Plus and Oppo A78 4G represent compelling options for users seeking 5G connectivity without breaking the bank. While both devices share a similar price point and target audience, key differences in their chipsets and charging capabilities dictate which phone is the better fit for specific needs. This comparison dissects those differences, providing a definitive guide for potential buyers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and slightly better overall performance, the vivo Y300 Plus emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers 5G connectivity and a performance edge, despite the Oppo A78 4G’s faster 67W charging. However, users heavily focused on rapid charging will find the Oppo A78 4G more appealing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 16 | 2023, July 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 16 | Available. Released 2023, July 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back or glass back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 74.9 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 160 x 73.2 x 7.9 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 183 g (6.07 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD, 76% in 30 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silk black, Silk green | Mist Black, Aqua Green |
| Models | V2422 | CPH2565 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.91 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y300 Plus
- 5G Connectivity with Snapdragon 695
- More Modern Chipset Architecture
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Potentially Better Power Efficiency
- Slower 44W Charging
- Limited Camera Information
Oppo A78 4G
- Faster 67W Charging with PD
- Potentially Higher Single-Core Performance
- Slightly Lower Price (potentially)
- Oppo's Camera Image Processing
- Lacks 5G Connectivity
- Older Snapdragon 680 Chipset
- No Reverse Wired Charging
Display Comparison
Neither vivo nor Oppo provide display specifications beyond resolution in their marketing materials. Assuming both utilize standard IPS LCD panels common in this price bracket, color accuracy and viewing angles will likely be similar. The absence of high refresh rates (90Hz or 120Hz) is expected. The real differentiator will be peak brightness, which is not specified, and PWM dimming frequency, which is crucial for users sensitive to flicker. Without this data, it's difficult to declare a clear winner.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are lacking for both devices. However, given the price point, it’s safe to assume both rely on primary sensors in the 50MP range. The Oppo A78 4G’s marketing emphasizes its camera, but without knowing aperture sizes or sensor dimensions, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on both devices is largely a marketing gimmick and offers limited practical value. Image processing algorithms will likely be the deciding factor, and Oppo historically leans towards more saturated, vibrant images, while vivo often aims for a more natural look. Without sample images, a definitive judgment is impossible.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y300 Plus features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), utilizing a Kryo 660 core configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Silver cores. The Oppo A78 4G employs the Snapdragon 680 4G (6nm), with a 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver setup. While both are 6nm chips, the Snapdragon 695’s architecture is more modern and includes an integrated 5G modem. The higher clock speeds of the A78’s Gold cores *suggest* a potential advantage in single-core tasks, but the 695’s superior architecture and 5G capabilities provide a broader performance benefit, especially for sustained workloads and future network compatibility. The 695 also benefits from Adreno 619 GPU, while the 680 uses Adreno 610, giving the Y300 Plus a slight edge in graphics performance.
Battery Life
The Oppo A78 4G boasts a significant advantage in charging speed with its 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 76% in 30 minutes. The vivo Y300 Plus offers 44W wired charging, which is still respectable but considerably slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the A78 4G is a major convenience factor. However, the Snapdragon 695 in the Y300 Plus is generally more power-efficient, potentially offsetting the charging speed difference with longer battery life during typical usage. The Y300 Plus also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the A78 4G.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300 Plus if you need 5G connectivity for faster data speeds and anticipate using your phone for several years. Its Snapdragon 695 offers a more modern architecture and better long-term support. Buy the Oppo A78 4G if you prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly. The 67W charging is a significant advantage for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the vivo Y300 Plus handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a consistently smooth experience. The Adreno 619 GPU is adequate for this price range, but don't anticipate high frame rates or ultra settings. The Oppo A78 4G's Snapdragon 680 will offer similar, if slightly less consistent, performance.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the Oppo A78 4G with the 67W charger?
Oppo claims 76% charge in 30 minutes. Based on this, a full 0-100% charge should take approximately 45-50 minutes under ideal conditions. However, charging speed slows down as the battery approaches full capacity.
❓ Does the vivo Y300 Plus support carrier aggregation for improved 5G speeds?
While Qualcomm doesn't explicitly list carrier aggregation support for the Snapdragon 695 in all configurations, it's highly likely the Y300 Plus supports at least some level of carrier aggregation, enabling faster and more stable 5G connections depending on your carrier and location.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using?
Generally, no. 2MP macro cameras on budget phones produce images with limited detail and often suffer from poor image quality. They are primarily a marketing feature and offer little practical benefit compared to using the main camera in standard photo mode.
