The sub-$250 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y300 Plus and Motorola Moto G54 both aim to deliver 5G connectivity and a solid user experience without breaking the bank. However, they take different approaches, with vivo leaning on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 695 while Motorola opts for MediaTek’s Dimensity 7020. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G54 emerges as the stronger contender. The Dimensity 7020 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Snapdragon 695 in the vivo Y300 Plus, making it better suited for multitasking and demanding applications. While the vivo boasts faster 44W charging, the G54’s more powerful processor justifies the slower 15W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 16 | 2023, September 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 16 | Available. Released 2023, September 05 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back or glass back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 74.9 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 161.6 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 183 g (6.07 oz) | 177 g (6.24 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) - InternationalmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - China |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 0.61µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 15W wired
Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silk black, Silk green | Midnight blue, Indigo blue, Glacier blue, Mint green |
| Models | V2422 | XT2343-1, XT2343-2 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | € 147.00 / $ 189.99 / £ 161.57 |
| SAR | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.91 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y300 Plus
- Significantly faster 44W charging
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G offers reliable 5G connectivity
- Snapdragon 695 is less powerful than Dimensity 7020
- Likely less efficient image processing
Motorola Moto G54
- More powerful MediaTek Dimensity 7020 chipset
- Superior CPU architecture for smoother performance
- Potentially better image processing capabilities
- Slower 15W charging
- May require more frequent charging due to potentially higher power draw
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing, the focus here is on processing power. The absence of high refresh rates on either device suggests a prioritization of battery life over visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature a primary camera and supporting lenses (likely a depth or macro sensor). The image processing capabilities of the respective chipsets will play a crucial role. The Dimensity 7020’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally more advanced than the Snapdragon 695’s, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction in photos and videos. The absence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G54’s MediaTek Dimensity 7020, built on a 6nm process, features two Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, alongside six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. This architecture provides a significant advantage over the vivo Y300 Plus’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (also 6nm), which uses two Kryo 660 Gold cores at 2.2 GHz and six Kryo 660 Silver cores at 1.8 GHz. The Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 7020 are more powerful than the Kryo 660 Gold cores, resulting in faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. While both use 6nm fabrication, the architectural differences favor the Dimensity 7020. The G54 will likely exhibit less stuttering in demanding applications.
Battery Life
The vivo Y300 Plus’s 44W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Moto G54’s 15W charging. This translates to significantly faster top-up times. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed allows the Y300 Plus to recover quickly from heavy usage. However, the Dimensity 7020’s improved efficiency might offset the slower charging speed to some extent, offering comparable overall battery life despite the charging wattage difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300 Plus if you prioritize extremely fast charging and frequently top up your phone throughout the day. Its 44W charging is a significant advantage. Buy the Motorola Moto G54 if you value overall performance and a smoother user experience, especially when running multiple apps or playing graphically intensive games. The Dimensity 7020 offers a more future-proof platform.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7020 in the Moto G54 struggle with graphically demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While not a flagship chipset, the Dimensity 7020 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. It’s a significant step up from the Snapdragon 695 and should provide a smoother gaming experience, though you shouldn’t expect maximum settings or consistently high frame rates.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to charge the vivo Y300 Plus from 0% to 100% with the 44W charger?
While vivo doesn't provide exact figures, a 44W charger typically takes around 60-75 minutes to fully charge a phone with a similar battery capacity. This is considerably faster than the Moto G54’s 15W charging, which could take over 2 hours.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G54 support VoLTE and 5G on all carriers?
Compatibility varies by region and carrier. It's crucial to check with your specific carrier to ensure the Moto G54 supports their VoLTE and 5G bands before purchasing. Motorola provides band information on their regional websites.
❓ Is the reverse wired charging on either phone useful for more than just emergencies?
Reverse wired charging is primarily a convenience feature for emergencies. The charging speeds are typically slow, making it impractical for regularly charging other devices. It's best used for providing a small boost to a friend's phone or accessories when no other power source is available.
