The sub-$250 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the vivo Y300 Plus and the Honor X8c aim to deliver connectivity and functionality without breaking the bank. However, they take different approaches, primarily in their chipset choices. This comparison dissects the key differences between the Snapdragon 695-powered vivo Y300 Plus and the Snapdragon 685-equipped Honor X8c, helping you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo Y300 Plus emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 695 offers a noticeable performance edge over the Snapdragon 685 in the Honor X8c, particularly in sustained workloads and 5G connectivity. While the Honor X8c’s slightly lower price may appeal to some, the Y300 Plus’s faster charging and superior processing power justify the small premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 16 | 2025, January 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 16 | Available. Released 2025, January 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back or glass back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 74.9 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 161.1 x 74.6 x 7.1 mm (6.34 x 2.94 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 183 g (6.07 oz) | 174 g (6.14 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 2800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 15, MagicOS 9 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.1, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0/5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 35W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silk black, Silk green | Marrs Green, Midnight Black, Moonlight White, Cloud Purple |
| Models | V2422 | ABR-LX1, ABR-LX2, ABR-LX3 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | € 190.78 / $ 213.42 / £ 159.00 |
| SAR | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.91 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y300 Plus
- Faster Snapdragon 695 5G chipset for better performance
- 44W fast charging for quicker top-ups
- Potentially better 5G connectivity
- Likely slightly higher price point
- No specific display details available
Honor X8c
- Potentially lower price
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Efficient Snapdragon 685 chipset
- Slower Snapdragon 685 chipset compared to the 695
- Slower 35W charging
- Less capable 5G modem
Display Comparison
Neither vivo nor Honor provided display specs beyond the existence of a display. Given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. However, the focus here is on the chipset, which will impact the smoothness of scrolling and responsiveness. Without specific refresh rate data, it's difficult to assess display quality beyond basic functionality. Expect both to prioritize power efficiency over high-end display features.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are absent. However, given the market segment, both phones likely feature a primary camera paired with depth or macro sensors. Without knowing sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. Image processing will likely be a key differentiator, with vivo historically leaning towards more vibrant, saturated images, while Honor often aims for a more natural look. The absence of OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y300 Plus boasts the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), featuring an octa-core configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. The Honor X8c utilizes the Snapdragon 685 (6nm) with a different core arrangement: 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53. While both are 6nm chips, the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo cores generally offer superior sustained performance and efficiency. The X8c’s Cortex-A73 cores provide a higher peak clock speed, but the 695’s architecture is more modern and better optimized for demanding tasks. This translates to a smoother experience with multitasking and more responsive app launches on the vivo Y300 Plus. The 695 also has a more capable 5G modem.
Battery Life
The vivo Y300 Plus features 44W wired charging, a significant advantage over the Honor X8c’s 35W wired charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed on the Y300 Plus will result in considerably quicker top-ups. A full charge from 0-100% is estimated to take around 60-70 minutes on the Y300 Plus, compared to 80-90 minutes on the X8c. This difference is crucial for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300 Plus if you prioritize consistent performance for multitasking, streaming, and light gaming, and value faster 44W charging for minimal downtime. Buy the Honor X8c if your primary focus is cost savings and you primarily use your phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and social media, and aren't heavily reliant on 5G speeds or demanding applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the vivo Y300 Plus handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 can run PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a smooth experience. The chipset isn't designed for ultra-high frame rates or graphics settings. The Honor X8c’s Snapdragon 685 will likely require even lower settings to achieve similar performance.
❓ How much faster is the 44W charging on the vivo Y300 Plus compared to the 35W charging on the Honor X8c in real-world use?
In practical terms, the 44W charging on the Y300 Plus can add approximately 30-40% battery in the time it takes the X8c to add 20-25%. This translates to a significantly reduced time to reach a full charge, making it ideal for users who need to quickly power up their device.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the vivo Y300 Plus offer a noticeable improvement in 5G speeds compared to the Snapdragon 685 in the Honor X8c?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 generally features a more advanced 5G modem, offering potentially faster download and upload speeds, as well as improved network stability, compared to the Snapdragon 685. This is particularly beneficial in areas with strong 5G coverage.
