The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo and the vivo Y300 represent compelling options in the competitive Chinese mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving it, primarily through their chipset choices. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on real-world performance implications and value for money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset offers a significant performance advantage over the Dimensity 6300 in the vivo Y300, coupled with faster 67W charging. While the Y300 is a capable device, the Turbo provides a more robust experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 16 | 2023, March 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 16 | Available. Released 2023, March 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76.2 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Strengthened glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Black, Blue, White, Harry Potter Edition |
| Models | V2435, V2435A | 23049RAD8C |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 270 EUR |
vivo Y300 (China)
- Reverse wired charging for accessory top-ups.
- Potentially more affordable price point.
- Reliable MediaTek Dimensity 6300 chipset for everyday tasks.
- Significantly lower performance compared to the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2.
- Slower 44W charging.
- Likely less advanced camera system.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo
- Superior performance with the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2.
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC4.
- Likely better camera capabilities.
- Potentially higher price.
- No reverse wired charging.
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load (though the 4nm process helps).
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Redmi Note 12 Turbo's positioning, it likely features a higher refresh rate panel (potentially 120Hz) compared to the Y300. The Turbo's price bracket suggests a higher probability of a brighter panel with better color accuracy. The absence of display details for the Y300 suggests a more cost-optimized approach, potentially sacrificing some display quality.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. However, Xiaomi generally prioritizes camera performance in its Redmi Note series. The Redmi Note 12 Turbo likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms than the vivo Y300. The Y300, being a more budget-focused device, likely employs a simpler camera setup. The absence of OIS information for either device suggests neither prioritizes advanced stabilization features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo Y300’s MediaTek Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The Snapdragon utilizes a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 2.91 GHz, offering significantly higher peak performance than the Y300’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.4 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon also translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Redmi Note 12 Turbo will demonstrably outperform the Y300 in CPU-intensive tasks and graphically demanding games. The Turbo's LPDDR5x RAM support (likely) further enhances performance compared to the Y300's potentially slower RAM configuration.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Turbo’s 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support is a significant advantage over the vivo Y300’s 44W charging. This translates to considerably faster charging times – likely a full charge in under 45 minutes for the Turbo versus potentially over an hour for the Y300. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the Turbo mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Y300's inclusion of reverse wired charging is a niche feature that may appeal to users who frequently charge accessories on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300 (China) if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance for everyday tasks and prioritize reverse wired charging. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo if you prefer a smoother experience for gaming, demanding applications, and appreciate significantly faster charging speeds, even if it means a slightly higher price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi Note 12 Turbo get noticeably hotter than the vivo Y300 during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is more powerful, its 4nm process node is more efficient than the Dimensity 6300's 6nm node. This means the Turbo is likely to manage heat better, experiencing less throttling and maintaining higher frame rates for longer periods, despite potentially reaching a slightly higher peak temperature.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 44W and 67W really that significant in everyday use?
Yes, the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 12 Turbo can save you a substantial amount of time. A typical 0-100% charge will likely take under 45 minutes, whereas the Y300's 44W charging could take over an hour, making the Turbo much more convenient for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 in the Redmi Note 12 Turbo offer enough performance to play demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is capable of running Genshin Impact at high settings with playable frame rates. While it won't match the performance of flagship chipsets, it provides a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience, especially when paired with optimized software and sufficient RAM.
