The Xiaomi Redmi K60E and vivo Y300 represent compelling options within the competitive Chinese mid-range smartphone market. Both leverage Mediatek's Dimensity series, but target slightly different priorities. The K60E aims for a more robust performance profile, while the Y300 focuses on delivering a solid experience at a potentially lower price point. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K60E is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 8200 chipset offers a significant performance advantage over the Y300’s Dimensity 6300, translating to smoother multitasking and better gaming. The faster 67W charging also provides a more convenient user experience, offsetting the slightly smaller potential battery capacity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 16 | 2022, December 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 16 | Available. Released 2022, December 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76.2 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 163.1 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Strengthened glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | OLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Black, White, Green |
| Models | V2435, V2435A | 22122RK93C |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 300 EUR |
vivo Y300 (China)
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- 44W wired charging with reverse wired charging
- Dimensity 6300 chipset is less powerful
- Likely less optimized for gaming
- Display specs unknown, potentially lower quality
Xiaomi Redmi K60E
- Powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset
- 67W fast charging with PD3.0
- Likely superior display quality
- Potentially higher price
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load
- Software experience can be feature-heavy
Display Comparison
While display specifications are missing for the vivo Y300, the Redmi K60E is expected to feature a high-refresh-rate AMOLED panel, common for its price bracket. The core difference lies under the hood: the Redmi K60E’s Dimensity 8200 is fabricated on a 4nm process, offering superior power efficiency compared to the Y300’s Dimensity 6300 built on a 6nm node. This translates to less heat generation during sustained use, potentially leading to more consistent display performance and reduced throttling.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the vivo Y300, a direct comparison is limited. However, Xiaomi typically equips its K-series phones with capable camera systems. The Redmi K60E is likely to feature a higher-resolution main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms than the Y300. While megapixel count isn't everything, a larger sensor generally captures more light, resulting in better low-light performance. The focus should be on the primary sensor quality, as auxiliary lenses (like 2MP macros) offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Redmi K60E’s Dimensity 8200 boasts a prime Cortex-A78 core clocked at 3.1 GHz, alongside three additional Cortex-A78 cores at 3.0 GHz. This contrasts with the Y300’s Dimensity 6300, which utilizes two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.4 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. The architectural advantage and higher clock speeds of the K60E’s chipset will result in noticeably faster app launch times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The K60E also benefits from potentially faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Redmi K60E’s 67W wired charging with PD3.0 support is a clear advantage over the Y300’s 44W charging. This means significantly faster top-up times – potentially reducing a full charge from 0-100% by 30-40 minutes. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the more efficient Dimensity 8200 in the K60E could offset a potentially smaller battery size, delivering comparable or even better real-world battery life. The inclusion of PD3.0 also offers wider compatibility with chargers and power banks.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300 (China) if you prioritize a potentially lower entry price and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media, calls, and light web browsing. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K60E if you demand a more responsive experience for gaming, demanding apps, and appreciate the convenience of significantly faster 67W charging. The K60E is the better option for power users and mobile gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi K60E get noticeably hotter than the vivo Y300 during extended gaming sessions?
The Redmi K60E, with its more powerful Dimensity 8200, will likely generate more heat under sustained load. However, the 4nm process node and Xiaomi’s thermal management solutions should mitigate this, preventing significant throttling. The Y300’s Dimensity 6300 will run cooler, but at the cost of performance.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Redmi K60E compatible with my existing USB-C chargers and power banks?
The Redmi K60E supports PD3.0, a widely adopted standard. It should be compatible with most USB-C chargers and power banks that also support PD3.0. However, to achieve the full 67W charging speed, you’ll need a compatible charger.
❓ How much of a performance difference will I see between the Dimensity 8200 and 6300 in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks, the difference won’t be dramatic. Both chips are capable of handling everyday use smoothly. However, the K60E will feel snappier and more responsive when switching between apps or loading complex web pages due to its superior processing power.
