The vivo Y300 (China) and Oppo K11x represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both devices target budget-conscious consumers seeking 5G connectivity, but they diverge in their core processing power and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects the key differences between the MediaTek Dimensity 6300-powered vivo Y300 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695-equipped Oppo K11x, helping you determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and a slightly more established software ecosystem, the Oppo K11x emerges as the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a generally stable experience. However, the vivo Y300’s Dimensity 6300 provides a potential edge in raw CPU performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 16 | 2023, May 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 16 | Available. Released 2023, May 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76.2 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 165.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Strengthened glass | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Jade Black, Pearl Blue |
| Models | V2435, V2435A | - |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo Y300 (China)
- Potentially stronger CPU performance with Dimensity 6300
- Reverse wired charging for accessory power
- Likely competitive pricing within the Chinese market
- Slower 44W charging compared to Oppo K11x
- Less established software ecosystem than Oppo’s ColorOS
- Camera performance is unknown without further specs
Oppo K11x
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- Stable and refined ColorOS software experience
- Proven Snapdragon 695 performance and modem
- Potentially weaker CPU performance compared to Dimensity 6300
- No reverse wired charging
- May be slightly more expensive than the vivo Y300
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on internals, we can infer both likely utilize standard LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of details like refresh rate or resolution suggests a focus on cost optimization. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will be adequate for everyday use but not geared towards content creation. The real difference will likely come down to panel calibration, a factor not specified in the provided data.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature a primary camera supplemented by depth or macro sensors. The absence of OIS on either device indicates a reliance on software stabilization. Image processing will likely differ – vivo typically leans towards vibrant, saturated colors, while Oppo often aims for a more natural look. The quality of the main sensor will be the determining factor, but without knowing the megapixel count or sensor size, it’s impossible to declare a clear winner.
Performance
The core battle lies between the MediaTek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 6300 features a more modern CPU architecture with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores alongside 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, suggesting a potential advantage in single-core and multi-core CPU tasks compared to the Snapdragon 695’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver configuration. However, the Snapdragon 695 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized software and modem integration. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 6300’s newer architecture *could* translate to slightly better efficiency. The impact on gaming will be moderate; both are capable of running popular titles at medium settings, but the Snapdragon 695’s Adreno 619 GPU is a known quantity with predictable performance.
Battery Life
The Oppo K11x’s 67W wired charging is a significant advantage. The claim of 80% charge in 33 minutes drastically reduces downtime compared to the vivo Y300’s 44W charging. While the Y300 offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the K11x, this is a niche benefit. Battery capacity isn’t specified, but the faster charging of the K11x effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. Users who frequently top up their phones will greatly benefit from the K11x’s charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300 (China) if you prioritize maximizing CPU performance for multitasking and light gaming, and value the potential for slightly longer software support from vivo. Buy the Oppo K11x if you prioritize rapid charging, a more refined user experience through ColorOS, and a proven track record of stable performance with the Snapdragon 695 platform.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo K11x struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running Genshin Impact, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to maintain a stable frame rate. It’s not a gaming powerhouse, but it provides a playable experience for casual gamers.
❓ Does the Dimensity 6300 in the vivo Y300 support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
While the provided data doesn't explicitly state carrier aggregation support, the Dimensity 6300 generally supports multiple carrier aggregation bands. However, actual 5G speeds will depend on your carrier and network conditions.
❓ How does Oppo’s ColorOS compare to vivo’s Funtouch OS in terms of bloatware?
Historically, ColorOS has been criticized for pre-installed bloatware, but Oppo has significantly reduced this in recent versions. Funtouch OS also includes pre-installed apps, but the amount can vary. Both offer customization options, but ColorOS is generally considered more polished and feature-rich.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the vivo Y300 slow compared to other phones in this price range?
44W charging is decent, but the Oppo K11x’s 67W charging is considerably faster. You can expect a full charge on the Y300 to take around 1.5-2 hours, while the K11x can reach 80% in just 33 minutes.
