The OnePlus Ace 2V and vivo Y300 represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Ace 2V, leveraging the flagship Dimensity 9000, aims for near-premium performance, while the Y300 focuses on delivering a solid experience with the more efficient Dimensity 6300. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the OnePlus Ace 2V is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9000 chipset and 80W charging significantly outperform the vivo Y300’s Dimensity 6300 and 44W charging. However, the Y300 offers a compelling value proposition for everyday users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 16 | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 16 | Available. Released 2023, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76.2 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 162.6 x 75.1 x 8.2 mm (6.40 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 191.5 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Strengthened glass | Asahi Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Black, Blue/Green |
| Models | V2435, V2435A | PHP110 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 310 EUR |
vivo Y300 (China)
- Efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset for good battery life
- 44W fast charging with reverse wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Significantly lower performance compared to the Ace 2V
- Likely less advanced camera system
- Slower charging speeds
OnePlus Ace 2V
- Flagship-level Dimensity 9000 performance
- Ultra-fast 80W charging (0-100% in 32 minutes)
- Superior gaming capabilities
- Potentially higher price
- More power-hungry chipset may lead to shorter battery life
- May run warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, both phones likely feature LCD panels given their price points. The key difference will be color accuracy and brightness. The Ace 2V, positioned higher, may benefit from a slightly wider color gamut and higher peak brightness. However, without specific data, it's difficult to quantify. Both will likely target a 60Hz or 120Hz refresh rate, with the Ace 2V potentially offering the smoother experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s challenging to make a definitive comparison. However, the Ace 2V, being the more premium device, likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing. The Dimensity 9000’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more capable than the Dimensity 6300’s. Expect better low-light performance and dynamic range from the Ace 2V. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the Ace 2V, while unconfirmed, is probable and would further enhance image quality.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The OnePlus Ace 2V’s Dimensity 9000, fabricated on a 4nm process, boasts a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.05 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 performance cores and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. This contrasts sharply with the vivo Y300’s Dimensity 6300 (6nm) featuring two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.4 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 4nm node of the Dimensity 9000 translates to superior thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Ace 2V will deliver significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience. The Dimensity 6300 is still capable, but geared towards everyday tasks.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Ace 2V’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in just 32 minutes. The vivo Y300’s 44W charging is respectable, but significantly slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Ace 2V’s more power-hungry Dimensity 9000 will likely necessitate a larger battery to maintain comparable battery life. The faster charging speed of the Ace 2V provides a substantial convenience advantage, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y300 (China) if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance for common tasks, and value efficient power consumption. Buy the OnePlus Ace 2V if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and the convenience of incredibly fast charging, even if it means slightly reduced battery life due to the more powerful processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 9000 in the OnePlus Ace 2V overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9000 is a powerful chip, its 4nm fabrication process and OnePlus’s thermal management solutions (likely including vapor chamber cooling) are designed to mitigate overheating. Some throttling is possible during extremely demanding games, but it should be less pronounced than on devices with less efficient chipsets.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the vivo Y300 sufficient for daily use, or will I find myself frequently needing to charge?
44W charging is adequate for overnight charging and topping up throughout the day. However, compared to the Ace 2V’s 80W charging, it will take considerably longer to reach a full charge. Users who frequently deplete their battery will likely appreciate the convenience of the Ace 2V’s faster charging.
❓ How much of a real-world performance difference will I notice between the Dimensity 9000 and the Dimensity 6300 in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the difference will be minimal. However, when launching demanding apps, multitasking, or playing graphically intensive games, the Dimensity 9000 will provide a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience.
