The vivo Y30 and Tecno Camon 16 S represent the fiercely competitive entry-level smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point, but they achieve this with different hardware choices. This comparison dissects those choices, focusing on performance, battery life, and overall value to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and occasional multitasking, the vivo Y30 is the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio P35 chipset, with its higher clocked cores, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Tecno Camon 16 S’s Helio P22. However, the difference isn't massive, and the Camon 16 S remains a viable option for basic usage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 07. Released 2020, May 09 | 2020, November 05. Released 2020, November 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 162 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm (6.38 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) | 164.5 x 76.5 x 9 mm (6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.47 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 10, HIOS 6.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | Unspecified |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dazzle Blue, Moonstone White | Ice Jadeite, Misty Grey, Blue Hawaii |
| Models | 1938 | - |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 130 EUR |
vivo Y30
- Faster CPU performance with Helio P35
- More responsive user experience
- Better suited for light gaming
- Potentially slightly shorter battery life
- 10W charging is slow
Tecno Camon 16 S
- Potentially lower price point
- Slightly better battery efficiency
- Adequate for basic smartphone tasks
- Slower CPU performance with Helio P22
- Noticeable lag with multitasking
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on processing power, we can infer both likely utilize standard IPS LCD panels common in this price bracket. Expect 720p+ resolution and adequate, but not exceptional, color reproduction. Bezels are likely to be noticeable on both, as manufacturers prioritize cost savings. Without specific brightness data, it's reasonable to assume both offer sufficient visibility for indoor use, but may struggle in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s common for phones in this segment to prioritize megapixel count over sensor size and image quality. We can assume both devices feature a primary camera, likely accompanied by auxiliary lenses (depth, macro) of limited utility. Image processing will likely be heavily reliant on software algorithms to enhance photos, and results will vary depending on lighting conditions. The absence of OIS on either device suggests low-light performance will be a weakness.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y30’s Mediatek Helio P35 (12nm) features an octa-core CPU configuration split into 4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This contrasts with the Tecno Camon 16 S’s Helio P22 (12nm) which utilizes a uniform octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 setup. The higher clock speeds on the Y30’s prime cores translate to faster single-core performance, beneficial for app launch times and general UI responsiveness. While both use the same 12nm process, the P35’s architecture provides a performance edge. The P22 is still capable for basic tasks, but will exhibit more noticeable lag when multitasking or running heavier applications.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 10W charging, indicating a similar charging experience – expect over 2 hours for a full charge. While battery capacity isn't specified, the Helio P35 in the Y30 is slightly more power-hungry than the P22 in the Camon 16 S. However, the performance advantage of the Y30 may justify the slightly reduced battery life for users who actively utilize the phone's capabilities. Real-world usage will dictate battery endurance, but both should comfortably last a full day with moderate use.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y30 if you need a phone that can handle slightly more demanding tasks like light gaming or running multiple apps simultaneously without significant slowdown. Buy the Tecno Camon 16 S if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you prioritize a potentially lower price point over raw performance. Both phones are geared towards users on a tight budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the vivo Y30 struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
No, the Helio P35 chipset in the vivo Y30 is more than capable of handling everyday apps like WhatsApp and Facebook without significant issues. The higher clock speeds provide a smoother experience compared to the Tecno Camon 16 S, especially when switching between apps.
❓ Is the Tecno Camon 16 S suitable for playing mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty?
While technically playable, the Tecno Camon 16 S’s Helio P22 chipset will likely struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty. Expect low frame rates and significant lag, even on the lowest graphics settings. The vivo Y30 offers a slightly better gaming experience, but still isn't ideal for serious mobile gaming.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge both phones from 0%?
With both phones utilizing 10W charging, expect a full charge to take approximately 2.5 to 3 hours. This is a relatively slow charging speed compared to modern smartphones, so overnight charging is recommended.
❓ Does either phone support fast charging?
No, neither the vivo Y30 nor the Tecno Camon 16 S supports fast charging. Both are limited to 10W charging, which is standard for phones in this price range.
