The Oppo F15 and vivo Y30 represent compelling options in the budget smartphone segment, but cater to slightly different priorities. The Y30 focuses on providing a functional experience at a very accessible price point, while the F15 aims for a step up in performance and convenience with faster charging. This comparison dissects the key differences between these two Mediatek-powered devices.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo F15 is the superior choice. Its Helio P70 chipset delivers noticeably better performance than the Y30’s Helio P35, and the 20W fast charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Y30 is more affordable, the F15’s improvements justify the price difference for those who value responsiveness and convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 07. Released 2020, May 09 | 2020, January 16. Released 2020, January |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm (6.38 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 7.9 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.47 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6771V Helio P70 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 20W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4025 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dazzle Blue, Moonstone White | Lightening Black, Unicorn White |
| Models | 1938 | CPH2001 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.20 W/kg (head) 0.55 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y30
- More affordable price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Potentially longer battery life (depending on capacity)
- Slower processor (Helio P35)
- Significantly slower charging (10W)
- Less responsive user experience
Oppo F15
- Faster processor (Helio P70)
- Faster charging (20W, 50% in 30 min)
- Smoother multitasking and app performance
- Improved image processing
- Slightly higher price
- Potentially shorter battery life (depending on capacity)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the market segment, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. Without specific resolution or brightness data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, the focus here is on internal components, and display differences are likely minimal. Expect standard 720p+ resolutions on both.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the image signal processor (ISP) within the Helio P70 of the Oppo F15 will likely offer better image processing capabilities, resulting in improved dynamic range and noise reduction. The ISP is integral to the camera experience, and the P70’s superior processing power will be noticeable. It's reasonable to assume the F15 will produce more consistently good photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo F15’s Mediatek Helio P70 (12nm) is a significant upgrade over the vivo Y30’s Helio P35 (12nm). The P70 features a more powerful CPU configuration – 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 cores paired with 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 cores – compared to the P35’s 4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53. The Cortex-A73 cores in the P70 offer substantially better single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both use the same 12nm process, the architectural improvements in the P70 provide a clear advantage. This benefits users who frequently switch between apps or engage in light gaming.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified, the charging capabilities are a key differentiator. The Oppo F15’s 20W wired charging, capable of delivering 50% charge in 30 minutes, is a significant advantage over the vivo Y30’s slower 10W charging. This faster charging speed dramatically reduces downtime, making the F15 more convenient for users who are constantly on the go. Even if the Y30 has a slightly larger battery, the F15’s faster charging will likely result in less perceived battery anxiety.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y30 if you prioritize absolute affordability and need a reliable device for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use. You’re willing to accept slower performance and longer charging times to stay within a tight budget. Buy the Oppo F15 if you want a smoother, more responsive experience, especially when multitasking or playing casual games, and if you value the convenience of fast charging to minimize downtime. The F15 is ideal for users who demand more from their smartphone without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo F15 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Helio P70 in the Oppo F15 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. While it won’t deliver a flagship-level gaming experience, it’s a significant step up from the Helio P35 in the vivo Y30, which may struggle with consistent performance even at lower settings. Expect some frame drops during intense action.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Oppo F15 compared to the vivo Y30 in real-world use?
The Oppo F15’s 20W charging can add approximately 50% battery life in 30 minutes, while the vivo Y30’s 10W charging will take considerably longer – potentially over an hour to achieve the same level of charge. This means you can quickly top up the F15 during short breaks, whereas the Y30 requires a much longer charging period.
❓ Is the difference in processor performance between the Helio P70 and Helio P35 noticeable for everyday tasks?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Helio P70’s more powerful Cortex-A73 cores result in snappier app launches, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall user experience. While both phones can handle basic tasks, the F15 will feel more fluid and less prone to lag when multitasking or switching between apps.
