Both the vivo Y30 (China) and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G target the budget-conscious 5G market, but they take distinctly different approaches to achieving affordability. The Y30 relies on a more economical chipset, while the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G opts for a more powerful, albeit slightly more expensive, processor. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best experience for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Y30’s Snapdragon 460, and the significantly faster 33W charging (fully charging in 58 minutes) is a game-changer for daily usability. While the Y30 is more affordable, the performance trade-offs are substantial.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 22. Released 2020, October 26 | 2020, November 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, December 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 165.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192.3 g (6.77 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 58 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Obsidian Black, Dawn White, Blue | Gray, Blue, Red/Mint |
| Models | V2034A | M2007J17C |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 370 EUR |
vivo Y30 (China)
- Potentially lower price point
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Qualcomm chipset offers decent efficiency
- Significantly slower performance
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Likely inferior camera quality
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 750G processor
- 33W fast charging (full charge in 58 minutes)
- Likely better camera performance
- Higher price compared to the vivo Y30
- May experience more heat under heavy load
- Potentially larger physical size
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, both likely utilize LCD panels. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G, being a slightly higher-tier device, may benefit from a higher peak brightness and potentially better color accuracy. The absence of information on refresh rates suggests both are likely capped at 60Hz, which is standard for this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s positioning suggests a more capable camera system. While both phones likely feature multiple rear cameras, the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G is more likely to include a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The Y30 likely focuses on providing a functional camera experience rather than pushing image quality boundaries.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 750G (8nm) is a significant upgrade over the vivo Y30’s Snapdragon 460 (11nm). The 8nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance. The CPU configuration further highlights this: the 750G features 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 cores alongside 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570 cores, compared to the Y30’s 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 and 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G. The 750G’s Adreno 619 GPU also provides a substantial graphics performance advantage, making it the better choice for mobile gaming.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but the charging speeds tell a crucial story. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s 33W wired charging, capable of a full charge in 58 minutes, is a massive advantage over the Y30’s 18W charging. Even if the Y30 has a slightly larger battery, the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s faster charging will minimize downtime and provide a more convenient user experience. Faster charging is particularly beneficial for users who frequently use their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y30 (China) if your primary need is basic smartphone functionality – calls, texts, light social media – and you’re on an extremely tight budget. You’ll accept slower performance and longer charging times. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G if you prioritize smoother multitasking, occasional gaming, and the convenience of rapid charging, even if it means spending a bit more upfront. The 750G chipset offers a far more future-proof experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 750G in the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 750G is well-equipped to handle PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings. The Adreno 619 GPU provides sufficient graphical power for a smooth gaming experience, and the 5G connectivity ensures low latency for online multiplayer.
❓ How much of a difference will the 33W charging make in daily use on the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G?
The 33W charging is a significant convenience. Being able to fully charge the phone in approximately 58 minutes means less downtime and more time using your device. This is particularly useful for users who frequently use their phones throughout the day and don't have time to charge overnight.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 460 in the vivo Y30 sufficient for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the Snapdragon 460 is capable of handling basic tasks like web browsing, social media, and messaging without significant issues. However, you may experience slowdowns when multitasking or running more demanding applications.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
The Snapdragon 750G supports carrier aggregation, which allows it to combine multiple 5G channels for faster download and upload speeds, provided your carrier supports it. This can result in a noticeably improved 5G experience in areas with strong network coverage.
