Both the vivo Y30 (China) and the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW target the budget-conscious 5G market, but they approach it with significantly different hardware. The Y30 prioritizes affordability, while the A51 5G UW aims for a balance of features and performance. This comparison dissects the core differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the vivo Y30’s Snapdragon 460, making it better suited for multitasking, gaming, and future-proofing. While the Y30 is cheaper, the A51 5G UW’s extra power justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 2, 4, 5, 13, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 260, 261 mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 22. Released 2020, October 26 | 2020, August 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, August 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 158.8 x 73.4 x 8.6 mm (6.25 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | 192.3 g (6.77 oz) | 188.8 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10, One UI 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 5 MP, AF |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 672 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 5 h |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Obsidian Black, Dawn White, Blue | Prism Bricks Blue |
| Models | V2034A | SM-A516V |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 470 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.70 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.32 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y30 (China)
- Lower price point makes it accessible.
- 18W charging is faster than the A51 5G UW's 15W.
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks.
- Significantly weaker Snapdragon 460 chipset.
- Likely limited gaming and multitasking capabilities.
- Potentially lower camera quality due to less powerful ISP.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset for smoother performance.
- Better thermal management and sustained performance.
- Superior ISP for improved camera image processing.
- Higher price compared to the vivo Y30.
- Slower 15W charging.
- May not be the best choice for users with extremely limited budgets.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are unavailable for the Y30, its market positioning suggests a standard LCD panel. The A51 5G UW also utilizes an LCD, but the focus here is on the chipset impact on UI smoothness. The Snapdragon 765G’s superior GPU will translate to a more responsive experience when scrolling and navigating the interface, even if the raw resolution and panel technology are comparable.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Snapdragon 765G includes a more powerful Image Signal Processor (ISP) than the 460. This means the A51 5G UW will likely exhibit better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions, and potentially support more advanced camera features. The Y30 will likely rely on software optimization to compensate for the less capable ISP, but will likely fall short in dynamic range and detail. The presence of a dedicated 5G modem in the 765G also allows for faster image uploads and sharing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm) is a significant leap over the vivo Y30’s Snapdragon 460 (11nm). The 765G features a Kryo 475 prime core clocked at 2.4GHz, alongside a Kryo 475 Gold and Silver cluster, offering a more sophisticated CPU architecture. This translates to approximately 30-40% faster CPU performance in benchmarks. Furthermore, the 7nm process node of the 765G is more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance under load. The Y30’s Snapdragon 460, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle with demanding games and multitasking.
Battery Life
The vivo Y30 features 18W wired charging, while the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW offers 15W. While the Y30 has a faster charging rate on paper, the Snapdragon 765G’s improved power efficiency in the A51 5G UW could offset this difference in real-world usage. The more efficient chipset will consume less power during typical tasks, potentially resulting in comparable or even longer battery life despite the slower charging speed. The actual 0-100% charge times will depend on battery capacity (unspecified for both devices), but the A51 5G UW’s efficiency is a key factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y30 (China) if you need a basic, functional 5G smartphone for essential tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW if you prioritize smoother performance, enjoy mobile gaming, or anticipate using demanding applications, and are willing to spend a bit more for a more capable device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 460 in the vivo Y30 struggle with popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty?
Yes, the Snapdragon 460 is a budget-oriented chipset and will likely struggle to deliver a smooth gaming experience in demanding titles like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty. You'll likely need to lower graphics settings significantly, and even then, expect frame drops and stuttering. The A51 5G UW’s Snapdragon 765G is far better equipped for mobile gaming.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW experience significant throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 765G, while not a flagship chipset, benefits from a 7nm process node which provides better thermal efficiency than the 11nm Snapdragon 460. While some throttling is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the A51 5G UW is less prone to severe performance drops compared to the Y30. The larger surface area of the A51 5G UW also aids in heat dissipation.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on both phones the same, or does the chipset affect 5G performance?
The Snapdragon 765G integrates a more advanced 5G modem than the one found in the Snapdragon 460. This translates to potentially faster 5G download and upload speeds, as well as better network stability, on the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW. The Y30’s 5G performance will be more limited by its chipset.
