vivo Y30 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the vivo Y30 5G’s 10W, and the 746 nit display offers a more vibrant viewing experience. However, the Y30 5G remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y30 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 25 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 25 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.9 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | V2160 | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y30 5G
- More affordable price point
- Functional 5G connectivity
- Decent battery endurance
- Extremely slow 10W charging
- Likely lower display brightness
- Potentially less refined camera performance
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- Brighter 746 nit display
- Potentially better camera performance
- Slightly higher price
- May not offer a significant performance leap over the Y30 5G
- Software bloat (typical of Xiaomi)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 746 nits. This is a substantial advantage over the unspecified brightness of the vivo Y30 5G, translating to better outdoor visibility. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for LCD/OLED panels), the higher peak brightness of the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G makes a tangible difference in real-world usage. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s panel is likely to offer a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience, especially for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Xiaomi generally focuses more on camera features in its Note series. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is likely to offer more refined image processing and potentially better low-light performance, even if the main sensor resolution is similar. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, a common feature in this series, would further enhance image and video quality.
Performance
Both phones utilize octa-core CPUs, but differ in their underlying architecture. The vivo Y30 5G employs the Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm), featuring two Cortex-A76 cores for performance and six Cortex-A55 cores for efficiency. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695 generally offers better power efficiency than the 7nm Dimensity 700, potentially leading to slightly longer battery life under similar workloads. While both CPUs peak at 2.2 GHz, the Kryo 660 Gold cores in the Snapdragon 695 are architecturally more advanced than the Cortex-A76, potentially offering a slight edge in sustained performance. However, real-world differences will likely be minimal for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The vivo Y30 5G is limited to 10W wired charging, a slow speed by today’s standards. In contrast, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G supports 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3 standards, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes. This charging speed is a game-changer for users who need to quickly top up their battery, making the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G far more convenient.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y30 5G if you need a functional 5G phone with basic features and are extremely budget-conscious, willing to sacrifice charging speed and display quality. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you prioritize a significantly faster charging experience, a brighter and more usable display, and are willing to spend a little more for these improvements. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is ideal for users who frequently use their phone throughout the day and need quick top-ups.