vivo Y30 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its 67W charging, capable of a full charge in just 41 minutes, significantly outperforms the vivo Y30 5G’s slow 10W charging. While both share an endurance rating of 119h, the Poco’s faster refueling is a major convenience advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y30 5G | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 25 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 25 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.9 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | V2160 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y30 5G
- Potentially lower upfront cost
- 5G connectivity
- Acceptable battery endurance
- Extremely slow 10W charging
- Less efficient chipset (Dimensity 700)
- Limited performance headroom
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- 67W fast charging (PD3.0, QC3)
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 695)
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Good battery endurance
- May be slightly more expensive
- Camera specs are unknown
- Display details are limited
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the price point, expect both to offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. The lack of information prevents a definitive winner, but the Poco X4 Pro’s potential for higher peak brightness, based on Xiaomi’s display trends, is a possibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific sensor details. Without knowing megapixel counts, sensor sizes, or aperture values, a meaningful comparison is impossible. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature. We can assume both will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low-light scenarios.
Performance
The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) holds a clear architectural advantage over the vivo Y30 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 6nm process generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal management. While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz core configuration, the Snapdragon utilizes Kryo 660 Gold cores, known for their efficiency, versus the Cortex-A76 in the Dimensity 700. This suggests the Poco X4 Pro will likely exhibit less throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Dimensity 700 is still capable, but the Snapdragon 695 offers a more refined experience.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y30 5G and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the charging experience is drastically different. The vivo Y30 5G’s 10W wired charging is exceptionally slow, taking over 6 hours for a full charge. In contrast, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, delivers a 70% charge in just 22 minutes and a full charge in 41 minutes. This charging speed difference is a game-changer for users who value convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y30 5G if your primary need is basic 5G connectivity and you prioritize a lower upfront cost, accepting a significantly slower charging experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value fast charging, potentially better sustained performance due to the more efficient 6nm Snapdragon 695, and a more future-proofed overall experience.