vivo Y30 5G vs. Oppo Reno7 5G: A Detailed Comparison for 5G Shoppers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and performance, the Oppo Reno7 5G is the better choice. Its significantly faster 65W charging, coupled with the more powerful Dimensity 900 chipset, justifies the price difference. However, the vivo Y30 5G remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y30 5G | Oppo Reno7 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 25 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 25 | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.9 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | V2160 | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y30 5G
- More affordable price point
- Functional 5G connectivity
- Decent battery endurance
- Slow 10W charging
- Less powerful processor
- Likely inferior camera performance
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Significantly faster 65W charging
- More powerful Dimensity 900 chipset
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Reverse wired charging
- Higher price tag
- Potentially similar battery life to Y30 5G despite more power
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno7 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 635 nits, compared to the unspecified brightness of the vivo Y30 5G. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels given their market segments, the Reno7’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. The Reno7 also claims an infinite contrast ratio, typical of LCDs, but the lack of detailed display specs for the Y30 5G makes a direct comparison difficult. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within their respective price brackets.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. The Reno7 5G likely benefits from Oppo’s established image processing algorithms, potentially delivering more refined images. Without knowing sensor sizes or aperture values for either device, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. It’s safe to assume the Reno7 5G will offer a more versatile and higher-quality camera experience, given its positioning as a mid-range device. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Reno7, a common feature in its class, is highly probable, further enhancing image and video quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo Y30 5G uses the Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm), while the Oppo Reno7 5G features the Dimensity 900 (6nm). The 6nm process of the Dimensity 900 offers improved power efficiency and thermal performance. Furthermore, the Reno7’s CPU configuration – 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores alongside 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Y30 5G’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking on the Reno7. While both support 5G, the Reno7’s more powerful processor will handle demanding 5G applications more effectively.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 123 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the Reno7’s more powerful processor. However, the charging experience is drastically different. The vivo Y30 5G is limited to 10W wired charging, meaning a full charge will take a considerable amount of time. In contrast, the Oppo Reno7 5G supports blazing-fast 65W wired charging, achieving a 100% charge in just 31 minutes. The Reno7 also offers reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories. This charging speed difference is a major advantage for the Reno7, minimizing downtime and maximizing usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y30 5G if you need a functional 5G smartphone on a strict budget and aren't concerned with rapid charging or demanding gaming. Buy the Oppo Reno7 5G if you prioritize faster performance for multitasking and gaming, and value the convenience of incredibly quick 65W charging, even if it means a higher upfront cost.