Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs vivo Y3 Standard: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Buyers

The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G and the vivo Y3 Standard represent two distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The A24 aims for a more modern experience with a brighter display and a more powerful chipset, while the Y3 Standard focuses on delivering basic functionality at an extremely competitive price point. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Helio G99 chipset offers significantly better performance than the Snapdragon 439 in the vivo Y3 Standard, and the brighter 1012 nit display provides a far more enjoyable viewing experience. While the Y3 Standard is cheaper, the A24’s improvements justify the price difference.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo Y3 Standard Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO -
Launch
Announced2019, November. Released 2019, November2023, April 19
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2023, May 05
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions159.4 x 76.7 x 8.9 mm (6.28 x 3.02 x 0.35 in)162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3 mm (6.38 x 3.06 x 0.33 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight191.5 g (6.77 oz)195 g (6.88 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 1544 pixels, 19.3:9 ratio (~268 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density)
Size6.35 inches, 99.6 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio)6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED, 90Hz, 1000 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.45 GHz Cortex A53)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 (12 nm)Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
GPUAdreno 505Mali-G57 MC2
OSAndroid 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.1Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 3GB RAM128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1-
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, panorama, HDR
Triple13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Single8 MP, f/1.813 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack Yes-
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP, LE5.3, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
RadioFM radioUnspecified
USBmicroUSB 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/nWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
Battery
Charging10W wired25W wired
Type5000 mAh, non-removableLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsInk blue, Jade RedBlack, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red
ModelsV1930ASM-A245F, SM-A245F/DS, SM-A245F/DSN, SM-A245M, SM-A245M/DS, SM-A245N
PriceAbout 130 EURAbout 150 EUR
SAR EU-0.41 W/kg (head)     1.30 W/kg (body)

vivo Y3 Standard

  • Significantly faster processor (Helio G99)
  • Much brighter and more vibrant display (1012 nits)
  • Faster 25W charging
  • Better camera image processing

  • Higher price point
  • May not have expandable storage (check specific model)

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G

  • Lower price
  • Potentially longer battery life under light use
  • Simple and easy-to-use interface

  • Slow Snapdragon 439 processor
  • Dimmer display
  • Slow 10W charging
  • Limited performance for gaming and demanding apps

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1012 nits. This is a substantial advantage over the vivo Y3 Standard, which lacks specific brightness data but is expected to be considerably dimmer given its lower price point. The higher brightness of the A24 translates to better visibility outdoors and a more immersive viewing experience. While both likely utilize LCD panels, the A24’s superior brightness and contrast make it the clear winner for media consumption and everyday use.

Camera Comparison

While both phones feature a camera, detailed specifications are limited for the vivo Y3 Standard. The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G’s camera system, though not flagship-level, benefits from a more modern image signal processor (ISP) within the Helio G99 chipset. This allows for improved image processing, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The A24’s lens aperture and sensor size are likely superior, contributing to better low-light performance. The presence of a dedicated night mode on the A24 further enhances its photographic capabilities, something likely absent on the Y3 Standard.

Performance

The performance gap between these two devices is considerable. The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G is powered by the Mediatek Helio G99, a 6nm chipset featuring two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the vivo Y3 Standard’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, a 12nm chip with four Cortex-A53 cores at 1.95 GHz and four at 1.45 GHz. The Helio G99’s newer architecture and higher clock speeds deliver a noticeable performance boost in both single-core and multi-core tasks, making the A24 far more responsive and capable of handling demanding applications and games. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended use.

Battery Life

The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G has an endurance rating of 141 hours, indicating solid battery life. While the vivo Y3 Standard’s battery capacity is unknown, its less powerful chipset and dimmer display likely result in comparable, if not slightly longer, battery life under light usage. However, the A24’s 25W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Y3 Standard’s slow 10W charging. This means the A24 can be charged much faster, minimizing downtime and providing greater convenience.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo Y3 Standard if you prioritize absolute affordability and only need a phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. It’s a suitable option for first-time smartphone users or those on a very tight budget. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G if you value performance, a vibrant display, and a more future-proof experience. It’s ideal for users who enjoy mobile gaming, streaming videos, or taking photos regularly.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Mediatek Helio G99 in the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Helio G99 is a relatively efficient chipset, and the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G’s thermal design is adequate for moderate gaming. While some heat is expected during extended gameplay, the 6nm process node helps to mitigate throttling compared to older, larger-node chipsets. Expect playable frame rates in most popular titles, but don't anticipate sustained peak performance for hours on end.
❓ Is the camera on the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G good enough for casual photography and social media?
Yes, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G’s camera is well-suited for casual photography and social media sharing. While it doesn’t compete with flagship-level cameras, the Helio G99’s ISP and likely larger sensor size deliver respectable image quality in good lighting conditions. Features like night mode can improve low-light performance, and the camera app offers various shooting modes for creative expression.
❓ Can the vivo Y3 Standard handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 439 in the vivo Y3 Standard is not ideal for demanding games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile. While you might be able to run them at the lowest settings, expect significant frame rate drops and lag, making the experience less enjoyable. The phone is better suited for less graphically intensive games.