The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) and the Tecno Spark 10 Pro aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price. However, they take different approaches, particularly in chipset selection, impacting performance and overall user experience. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Tecno Spark 10 Pro is the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio G88 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the vivo Y3’s Helio P35, translating to smoother multitasking and a more responsive experience. While both offer similar battery endurance and charging speeds, the Tecno’s brighter display enhances usability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (2CA) Cat6 400/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2019, October | Available. Released 2023, March 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.4 x 76.7 x 8.9 mm (6.28 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 168.4 x 76.2 x 8.4 mm (6.63 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1544 pixels (~268 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.35 inches, 99.6 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.3 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.0 | Android 13, HIOS 12.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
other unspecified cameras |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8 | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ink blue, Jade Red | Starry Black, Pearl White |
| Models | - | KI7 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | £ 245.74 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 131h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1991:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 249938 (v9)
GeekBench: 1358 (v5.1), 1376 (v6)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)
- Potentially more established brand reputation.
- Simple and straightforward user experience.
- Adequate battery life for basic use.
- Significantly weaker processor performance.
- Likely lower quality display.
- Limited multitasking capabilities.
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
- More powerful Mediatek Helio G88 chipset.
- Brighter and more vibrant display.
- Better overall performance for gaming and multitasking.
- Less established brand in some markets.
- Camera performance likely similar to vivo Y3.
- 4GB RAM may still limit performance with demanding apps.
Display Comparison
The Tecno Spark 10 Pro boasts a significantly more usable display experience. While both share a nominal 1991:1 contrast ratio, the Tecno’s measured peak brightness of 521 nits is a tangible advantage over the vivo Y3’s unspecified brightness. This means better visibility outdoors and in brightly lit environments. The lack of detailed display specifications for the Y3 suggests a lower-quality panel, likely impacting color accuracy and viewing angles. Neither device specifies refresh rate, implying both operate at the standard 60Hz.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Given the price point, expecting flagship-level camera performance is unrealistic. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison impossible. It’s safe to assume both rely on software processing to enhance image quality. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The Tecno Spark 10 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G88 (12nm) is a clear upgrade over the vivo Y3’s Helio P35 (12nm). The G88 utilizes a more modern CPU architecture – 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 – compared to the P35’s 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53. The Cortex-A75 cores in the G88 offer significantly better single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and general responsiveness. While both are 12nm chips, the architectural improvements in the G88 translate to a smoother user experience, especially when multitasking. The 4GB of RAM in both devices will likely be a bottleneck for heavier tasks, but the G88 will manage it more effectively.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y3 and Tecno Spark 10 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 131 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. Both also support 18W wired charging. This means a full charge will likely take around 2-3 hours, depending on the charger used. The similar endurance ratings indicate that despite potential chipset efficiency differences, both phones offer all-day battery life for moderate users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you prioritize simplicity and a potentially more established brand reputation. Buy the Tecno Spark 10 Pro if you want a more capable device for occasional gaming, streaming, and multitasking, and you value a brighter, more vibrant display for media consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Tecno Spark 10 Pro handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty?
The Helio G88 in the Tecno Spark 10 Pro is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a playable frame rate. The 4GB of RAM may also cause occasional stuttering during intense gameplay. The vivo Y3’s Helio P35 will struggle significantly with these titles.
❓ How does the Mediatek Helio G88 compare to the Helio P35 in terms of everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
The Helio G88 offers a noticeably smoother experience for everyday tasks. App launch times will be faster, scrolling will be more fluid, and multitasking will be less laggy compared to the Helio P35. The architectural improvements in the G88’s CPU cores make a significant difference in responsiveness.
❓ Is the 18W charging fast enough, or should I expect a slow charging experience?
18W charging is relatively standard for phones in this price range. Expect a full charge to take approximately 2-3 hours using a compatible charger. While not 'fast charging' in the modern sense, it's adequate for overnight charging or topping up throughout the day. Both phones share the same charging wattage.
