The sub-$200 4G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y29s and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G represent compelling options, but cater to different priorities. The Y29s emphasizes exceptional battery endurance, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G prioritizes rapid charging and a brighter display. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the vivo Y29s is the clear winner. Its remarkable 46:06h battery endurance significantly outpaces the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G. However, if you value quick top-ups and a brighter screen, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s 67W charging and 1047 nits peak brightness make it a strong contender.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Malaysia | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 11 | 2024, January 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2024, January 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 77 x 8.2 mm (6.59 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 8 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 570 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.4", 1.0µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 67W wired, 50% in 16 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Ion 5500 mAh - Global· Li-Ion 5150 mAh - EU, LATAM | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Gold, Dark Green | Midnight Black, Lavender Purple, Forest Green |
| Models | V2446 | 23117RA68G, 2312FPCA6G |
| Price | About 170 EUR | € 92.00 / $ 269.99 / £ 299.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 46:06h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
vivo Y29s
- Exceptional battery life (46:06h endurance)
- More efficient 6nm Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance due to thermal efficiency
- Slower 15W charging
- Display brightness likely lower than Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
- 67W fast charging (50% in 16 min, 100% in 46 min)
- Brighter display (1047 nits peak brightness)
- Potentially more versatile camera features
- Significantly shorter battery life (11:36h endurance)
- Helio G99 Ultra chipset less efficient than Dimensity 6300
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1047 nits. This is a substantial advantage for outdoor visibility, making it ideal for users who frequently use their phones in direct sunlight. While the Y29s display specifications are not provided, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s brightness level suggests a superior viewing experience in challenging lighting conditions. The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G likely utilizes an AMOLED panel, common in this price bracket, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks, while the Y29s panel type is unknown.
Camera Comparison
The context data for both devices is limited regarding camera capabilities. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s inclusion of 'Photo / Video' suggests a more feature-rich camera experience. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. It’s reasonable to assume the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G will offer more versatile camera modes and potentially better image quality, given Xiaomi’s focus on camera technology. The Y29s likely offers a more basic camera setup geared towards casual photography.
Performance
Both phones utilize Mediatek chipsets with similar CPU core configurations – an octa-core setup featuring 2x Cortex-A76 and 6x Cortex-A55 cores. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s Helio G99 Ultra operates at a slightly lower peak frequency (2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz on the Y29s’ Dimensity 6300). The Dimensity 6300, built on a more efficient 6nm process, potentially offers better thermal management and sustained performance under load. While the CPU clock speed difference is minor, the 6nm node gives the Y29s a slight edge in efficiency. Neither chipset is a gaming powerhouse, but both should handle everyday tasks and moderate gaming without issue.
Battery Life
The vivo Y29s truly shines in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 46:06h of usage. This is a remarkable figure, indicating the Dimensity 6300’s efficiency and potentially a larger battery capacity (though not specified). In contrast, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G delivers 11:36h of active use. While this is still respectable, it’s significantly less than the Y29s. The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G compensates with its 67W fast charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 16 minutes and 100% in 46 minutes. The Y29s is limited to a slower 15W charging rate, meaning a full charge will take considerably longer.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y29s if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, or if you frequently find yourself away from power outlets. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G if you prefer the convenience of extremely fast charging, enjoy media consumption in bright sunlight, and don't mind charging your phone more frequently.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G's charging compared to the vivo Y29s in a real-world scenario?
The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G's 67W charging can take you from 0% to 100% in approximately 46 minutes. The Y29s' 15W charging will likely take over two hours to achieve the same result. This means you can quickly top up the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G during short breaks, while the Y29s requires a longer charging period.
❓ Will the Dimensity 6300 in the vivo Y29s struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Dimensity 6300 isn't a high-end gaming chip, it should be capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The 6nm process and efficient core design will help mitigate thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions, offering a more consistent experience than the Helio G99 Ultra under sustained load.
❓ Is the difference in battery life between the two phones noticeable in everyday use?
Absolutely. The 46:06h endurance of the vivo Y29s translates to potentially two full days of use for average users, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G will likely require daily charging. If you frequently travel or have limited access to power outlets, the Y29s is the far more practical choice.
