The Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro and vivo Y29s represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Poco X6 Pro aggressively targets performance with its flagship-adjacent Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset, while the vivo Y29s prioritizes longevity and efficiency with the Dimensity 6300 and a focus on battery endurance. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra delivers significantly more processing power. However, the vivo Y29s excels in battery life, offering over 46 hours of endurance, making it ideal for users who value extended usage between charges.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Malaysia | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 11 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 77 x 8.2 mm (6.59 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 570 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Ion 5500 mAh - Global· Li-Ion 5150 mAh - EU, LATAM | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Gold, Dark Green | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | V2446 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 170 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 46:06h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
vivo Y29s
- Exceptional battery life (46:06h endurance)
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- 1000 charge cycles promise long-term usability
- Slower charging speed (15W)
- Less powerful chipset for demanding games
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Fast 67W charging with QC2.0/PD3.0 support
- High peak brightness display (1148 nits)
- Significantly shorter battery life (11:46h)
- May require more frequent charging
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro immediately distinguishes itself with a measured peak brightness of 1148 nits, offering excellent visibility in direct sunlight – a crucial advantage over the Y29s, which lacks specified brightness data and likely operates at a lower peak. While the Y29s’ panel technology isn’t detailed, the X6 Pro’s brightness suggests a more advanced display capable of richer colors and better HDR performance. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown for the Y29s, but the X6 Pro’s focus on overall user experience suggests a well-optimized display.
Camera Comparison
The context data for both devices is limited regarding camera capabilities, only mentioning 'Photo / Video' for the Poco X6 Pro. However, given Xiaomi’s history with Poco devices, we can expect a more feature-rich camera system with potentially larger sensors and more advanced image processing. The Y29s’ camera specifications are entirely absent, suggesting a more basic setup. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but the X6 Pro is likely to offer superior image quality and versatility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo Y29s’ Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The 8300 Ultra’s CPU configuration – 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – provides a significant performance boost over the Y29s’ 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The 4nm process node of the 8300 Ultra also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The X6 Pro’s likely use of faster LPDDR5x RAM further enhances its performance advantage.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the vivo Y29s shines. Its impressive 46:06h endurance score significantly surpasses the Poco X6 Pro’s 11:46h active use score. This difference is likely due to the more efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset and potentially a more optimized software experience. However, the Poco X6 Pro compensates with its 67W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 45 minutes, while the Y29s is limited to a slower 15W charge. The X6 Pro also supports QC2.0 and PD3.0, offering broader compatibility with chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y29s if you need a phone that can reliably last through a full day – and then some – of moderate use, and aren't heavily invested in demanding mobile gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prioritize a smooth, responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and content creation, and are willing to charge your phone more frequently to unlock that performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Poco X6 Pro’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra is built on a 4nm process, which generally offers better thermal efficiency than the 6nm Dimensity 6300 in the vivo Y29s. While some heat is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the X6 Pro is likely to manage temperatures more effectively, minimizing throttling and maintaining consistent performance. However, sustained peak performance will still generate heat.
❓ How does the 15W charging on the vivo Y29s impact the overall user experience?
The 15W charging on the vivo Y29s is considerably slower than the 67W charging on the Poco X6 Pro. While the Y29s’ exceptional battery life reduces the need for frequent charging, topping up the battery will take significantly longer. Expect a full charge to take well over two hours, requiring overnight charging as the primary method.
❓ Is the difference in battery endurance between the two phones noticeable in real-world usage?
Absolutely. The 46:06h endurance of the vivo Y29s translates to potentially two full days of moderate use on a single charge, while the Poco X6 Pro will likely require daily charging. Users who frequently travel or have limited access to power outlets will greatly benefit from the Y29s’ superior battery life.
