The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y29s and Samsung Galaxy A55 represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The Y29s prioritizes exceptional battery life, while the A55 focuses on a brighter, more vibrant display and a more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life, the vivo Y29s is the clear winner, boasting a remarkable 46:06h endurance. However, the Samsung Galaxy A55 offers a superior viewing experience with its 1010 nit display and a more capable processor for demanding tasks, making it the better choice for multimedia enthusiasts and gamers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Malaysia | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 11 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 77 x 8.2 mm (6.59 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 570 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Ion 5500 mAh - Global· Li-Ion 5150 mAh - EU, LATAM | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Gold, Dark Green | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | V2446 | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 46:06h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
vivo Y29s
- Exceptional battery life (46:06h endurance)
- Long-term battery health (1000 charge cycles)
- Potentially lower price point
- Slower charging speed (15W)
- Less powerful processor
- Likely lower display brightness
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Brighter, more vibrant display (1010 nits)
- More powerful processor (Exynos 1480)
- Faster charging (25W)
- Significantly shorter battery life (13:27h)
- Potentially higher price
- May experience more thermal throttling
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 immediately distinguishes itself with a peak brightness of 1010 nits, measured directly, offering significantly better visibility outdoors compared to the vivo Y29s (brightness data unavailable). While the Y29s’ panel type isn’t specified, the A55 likely utilizes a Super AMOLED panel, known for its vibrant colors and deep blacks. The A55’s higher brightness is particularly beneficial for HDR content consumption, something the Y29s will struggle to reproduce effectively. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this price segment, but the A55’s display technology provides a clear advantage in overall visual quality.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the vivo Y29s, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung typically invests heavily in image processing. The Galaxy A55 likely benefits from Samsung’s advanced algorithms for noise reduction and dynamic range optimization. While both phones likely include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, the A55’s image processing pipeline is expected to deliver more consistent and refined results. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A55 (assumed based on Samsung’s typical implementation) would further enhance image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, by reducing blur from hand shake.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480, built on a 4nm process, holds a performance edge over the vivo Y29s’ Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The A55’s CPU configuration – Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) – features faster Cortex-A78 cores compared to the Y29s’ Cortex-A76 cores, translating to quicker app launches and smoother multitasking. The 4nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1480 also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones feature octa-core CPUs, the A55’s architecture and process node provide a noticeable performance uplift.
Battery Life
The vivo Y29s dominates in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 46:06h of usage. This is significantly longer than the Samsung Galaxy A55’s 13:27h active use score. While the A55’s 25W charging is faster than the Y29s’ 15W charging, the Y29s’ larger effective battery capacity (implied by the endurance test) means it can go longer between charges. The Y29s also claims 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a focus on long-term battery health. The A55’s faster charging is convenient, but the Y29s’ exceptional endurance minimizes the need for frequent top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y29s if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and if battery anxiety is a major concern. It’s ideal for travelers, commuters, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a brighter, more responsive display for streaming videos and gaming, and if you value a more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and app performance. It’s geared towards users who actively consume content and demand a more fluid user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1480 in the Galaxy A55 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 1480 is a capable chip, it can experience some thermal throttling during extended gaming. The 4nm process helps mitigate this, but demanding titles at high settings may lead to reduced performance over time. The vivo Y29s, with its less powerful Dimensity 6300, is less likely to overheat but will offer lower frame rates.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed (15W vs 25W) between the Y29s and A55 significant in real-world use?
Yes, the 25W charging on the Galaxy A55 will noticeably reduce charging times. However, given the Y29s’ exceptional battery life, the need to charge frequently is diminished, lessening the impact of the slower charging speed. The A55 will go from 0-100% faster, but the Y29s will require charging less often.
❓ How does the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 handle multitasking compared to the Exynos 1480?
The Exynos 1480, with its faster Cortex-A78 cores, provides a smoother multitasking experience. The Y29s’ Dimensity 6300 can handle everyday tasks adequately, but the A55 will exhibit less lag when switching between multiple apps or running resource-intensive applications.
