The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y29 and Oppo Reno10 Pro represent compelling options for users seeking a balance of features and affordability. While both devices operate within a similar price bracket, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in chipset and charging capabilities. This comparison will dissect these differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and faster charging, the Oppo Reno10 Pro is the superior choice, offering a measured 11:05h of active use and 80W charging. However, the vivo Y29 presents a strong value proposition, delivering respectable performance with the Dimensity 6300 at a potentially lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 24 | 2023, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 24 | Available. Released 2023, July 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1608 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.68 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS, HDR, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC3
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glacier Blue, Titanium Gold, Diamond Black | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple |
| Models | V2420 | CPH2525 |
| Price | ₹ 13,999 | € 229.99 / ₹ 31,999 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y29
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 778G
- Slower charging speed (44W vs 80W)
- Likely inferior camera performance
Oppo Reno10 Pro
- Superior chipset performance (Snapdragon 778G)
- Faster 80W charging with PD3.0/QC3
- Longer battery life (11:05h active use)
- Higher price compared to vivo Y29
- May be overkill for basic users
- Potentially larger footprint
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno10 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 793 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors compared to the vivo Y29 (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize 6nm chipsets, the Reno10 Pro’s display advantage is crucial for media consumption and usability in bright environments. We expect the Y29 to have a standard LCD panel, while the Reno10 Pro likely uses AMOLED, offering superior contrast and color accuracy. Bezels are expected to be similar, given both phones target the mid-range segment.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are limited, but the Reno10 Pro is expected to offer a more sophisticated camera system. While both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, the Reno10 Pro’s image processing capabilities, leveraging the Snapdragon 778G’s ISP, will likely result in better dynamic range and low-light performance. We anticipate the Reno10 Pro to have Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on its main sensor, a feature likely absent on the Y29, further enhancing image quality and video stabilization. The Y29’s camera is likely geared towards casual photography, while the Reno10 Pro aims for a more enthusiast-level experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo Y29 features the Mediatek Dimensity 6300, while the Oppo Reno10 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G. The Snapdragon 778G, built on a 6nm process, employs a more powerful Cortex-A78 prime core (2.4 GHz) compared to the Y29’s Cortex-A76 (2.4 GHz). The Reno10 Pro also benefits from additional A78 cores (3x2.2 GHz) which will provide a noticeable performance boost in multi-threaded tasks and gaming. While both are 6nm, the architectural advantages of the Snapdragon 778G translate to superior sustained performance and potentially better thermal management. The Y29’s Cortex-A55 efficiency cores (6x2.0 GHz) are clocked similarly to the Reno10 Pro’s (4x1.9 GHz), but the overall CPU configuration favors the Oppo device.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno10 Pro clearly excels in battery performance, achieving an impressive 11:05h of active use and an endurance rating of 104 hours. This is significantly better than what we’d expect from a phone in this price range. The Reno10 Pro’s 80W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, allows for incredibly fast top-ups, minimizing downtime. The vivo Y29 offers 44W wired charging with reverse wired charging, which is respectable but slower. While the Y29’s battery capacity is unknown, the Reno10 Pro’s superior charging speed and endurance rating make it the clear winner for users who prioritize battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y29 if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance for everyday tasks and prioritize affordability. It’s ideal for users who don’t heavily game or require the fastest charging speeds. Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro if you prefer a longer-lasting battery, significantly faster 80W charging, and a more refined overall experience, even if it comes at a slightly higher cost. This phone is better suited for power users and those who frequently travel.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 6300 in the vivo Y29 struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 6300 is capable of handling most mobile games, Genshin Impact and other graphically intensive titles will likely require reduced graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Snapdragon 778G in the Reno10 Pro offers a more comfortable gaming experience with higher settings.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Oppo Reno10 Pro with the 80W charger?
The Oppo Reno10 Pro’s 80W SuperVOOC charging can typically charge the battery from 0% to 100% in around 30-35 minutes, making it exceptionally convenient for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Is the reverse wired charging on either phone useful for charging accessories like earbuds?
Yes, both phones offer reverse wired charging, allowing you to use them as a power bank for smaller devices like earbuds or smartwatches. However, the charging speed will be significantly slower than using a dedicated charger.
❓ What type of storage does the Oppo Reno10 Pro use, and does it support expansion?
The Oppo Reno10 Pro utilizes UFS 2.2 storage, offering fast read and write speeds. However, it does *not* support microSD card expansion, so you'll need to choose a storage configuration that meets your needs upfront.
