Samsung Galaxy A15 5G vs vivo Y27 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing display brightness and sustained performance, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G emerges as the better choice. Its Dimensity 6100+ chipset, coupled with a brighter 786-nit display, provides a smoother and more visually engaging experience, despite the slower 15W charging of the vivo Y27 5G.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y27 5G | Samsung Galaxy A15 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 5, 7, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 26, 28, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, July 12 | 2023, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July | Available. Released 2023, December 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 76.2 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 160.1 x 76.8 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 600 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8, up to 4 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Satin Purple, Mystic Black | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Magical Blue, Optimistic Blue |
| Models | V2302 | SM-A156B, SM-A156B/DS, SM-A156P, SM-A156P/DS, SM-A156U, SM-A156U1, SM-A156U1/DS, SM-A156W, SM-A156P/N, SM-A156P/DSN, SM-S156VL, SM-A156M, SM-A156E, SM-A156E/DSN |
| Price | - | € 167.00 / $ 79.97 / ₹ 17,490 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 1.46 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y27 5G
- Brighter and more vibrant display (786 nits)
- More efficient Dimensity 6100+ chipset (6nm)
- Faster 25W wired charging
- Potentially higher price point
- May lack reverse wired charging
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially lower initial cost
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Dimmer display
- Slower 15W wired charging
- Less efficient Dimensity 6020 chipset (7nm)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 786 nits. This is a substantial improvement over what we'd expect in this price bracket and translates to better visibility outdoors. While both phones likely utilize LCD panels (given the price point), the higher brightness of the A15 5G makes a noticeable difference. The vivo Y27 5G’s display specifications are not provided, so we can only assume it falls behind in peak brightness and potentially color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited. Without information on sensor sizes or aperture values, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given Samsung’s generally more aggressive image processing, the A15 5G is likely to produce more vibrant and contrast-rich images. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and offer limited practical benefit. The primary sensor quality will be the determining factor, and without specific details, we can only assume a slight advantage for Samsung based on brand reputation.
Performance
Both the vivo Y27 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G employ an octa-core CPU configuration with the same core arrangement: 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. However, the Samsung utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ built on a more efficient 6nm process, while the vivo uses the Dimensity 6020 on a 7nm process. This smaller node generally translates to improved power efficiency and potentially slightly higher clock speeds under sustained load. While the CPU architecture is identical, the 6nm process gives the A15 5G a marginal edge in thermal management and sustained performance, particularly during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving 14 hours and 31 minutes of active use. While the vivo Y27 5G’s battery capacity is not specified, the A15 5G’s performance is impressive. The A15 5G supports 25W wired charging, significantly faster than the vivo Y27 5G’s 15W charging. This means the A15 5G can replenish its battery much quicker, minimizing downtime. The faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential concerns about the A15 5G’s battery capacity being lower than the vivo Y27 5G.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y27 5G if you prioritize reverse wired charging and a slightly lower initial cost, accepting a trade-off in display brightness and potentially sustained performance. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G if you value a brighter, more vibrant display, and a chipset that offers a small but measurable performance advantage, making it better suited for multitasking and moderately demanding apps.