The vivo Y22 and Oppo A17k represent the fiercely competitive entry-level smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point, but they diverge significantly in their core processing power. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on how the chipset choices impact real-world performance and user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and occasional gaming, the vivo Y22 is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Helio G85 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Oppo A17k’s Helio G35, making it better suited for multitasking and demanding applications. However, the A17k remains a viable option for basic use cases.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 05 | 2022, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 05 | Available. Released 2022, October 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IPX4 water resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 530 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | - |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starlite Blue, Metaverse Green, Summer Cyan | Navy Blue, Gold |
| Models | V2207 | CPH2471 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 130 EUR |
vivo Y22
- Superior processing power with the Helio G85
- More efficient CPU architecture for better multitasking
- Potentially better camera image processing
- May be slightly more expensive than the Oppo A17k
- Potentially slightly faster battery drain during heavy use
Oppo A17k
- Likely more affordable price point
- Adequate performance for basic smartphone tasks
- Potentially optimized color science for display
- Significantly weaker processor compared to the Y22
- Struggles with multitasking and demanding apps
- Lower performance in gaming
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Both likely utilize LCD panels given their price bracket. The key differentiator will be color accuracy and peak brightness. Oppo historically focuses on color science, potentially giving the A17k a slight edge in vibrancy, but the Y22's processor might allow for more efficient display rendering. Bezels are likely comparable, being relatively thick on both to maintain affordability.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature a primary camera paired with depth or macro sensors. The image signal processor (ISP) within the Helio G85 of the Y22 is more advanced, allowing for better noise reduction and dynamic range in photos and videos. The A17k’s ISP will be adequate for basic photography, but will struggle in low-light conditions. The quality of the software processing will also play a role, but the underlying hardware advantage favors the Y22.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y22’s Mediatek Helio G85, built on a 12nm process, features an octa-core configuration with 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture prioritizes performance with the A75 cores offering significantly more processing power than the Oppo A17k’s Helio G35. The A17k utilizes 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. While the A17k's cores clock slightly higher, the A53 architecture is less efficient and powerful than the A75. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Y22. The G85 also benefits from a more capable GPU, further widening the performance gap.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, both feature 18W wired charging. The Helio G85 in the Y22, while more powerful, is also more efficient under sustained load. This means that despite potentially having similar battery capacities, the Y22 might offer slightly better battery life during demanding tasks like gaming. The 18W charging will provide a reasonable, though not exceptionally fast, charge time for both devices, likely taking around 2 hours for a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y22 if you need a phone capable of handling more than just basic tasks – think social media, light gaming, and running multiple apps simultaneously. Its stronger processor will provide a smoother, more enjoyable experience. Buy the Oppo A17k if your primary needs are limited to calls, texts, and very light app usage, and you prioritize a potentially lower price point over performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the vivo Y22 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Helio G85 in the vivo Y22 is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Oppo A17k’s Helio G35 will struggle with these titles, even on the lowest settings.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Helio G85 and Helio G35 noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Y22 will feel snappier and more responsive when switching between apps, loading web pages, and scrolling through social media feeds. The A17k may exhibit slight lag or delays during these tasks.
❓ Does either phone support fast charging beyond 18W?
Neither phone officially supports charging speeds beyond 18W. While they may be compatible with faster chargers, they will only draw power at the 18W rate.
❓ Which phone is better for taking photos in low-light conditions?
The vivo Y22 is better suited for low-light photography due to the more capable ISP within the Helio G85 chipset. This allows for better noise reduction and improved image clarity in challenging lighting situations.
