The vivo Y21t and Oppo F19s represent compelling options in the competitive Indian budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they diverge significantly in their core processing power and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences, helping you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and future-proofing, the vivo Y21t emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 680, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a noticeable advantage over the Oppo F19s’ Snapdragon 662, despite the latter’s faster 33W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 03 | 2021, September 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 03 | Available. Released 2021, September 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Pearl White | Glowing Black, Glowing Gold |
| Models | - | CPH2219, CPH2223 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 230 EUR |
vivo Y21t (India)
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Better long-term performance potential
- 2.5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower 18W charging
- Potentially less refined camera software
Oppo F19s
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Potentially more camera-focused features
- Sleek design (based on Oppo's typical aesthetic)
- Less efficient Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Potential for throttling under heavy load
- No reverse charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are expected to feature LCD panels, typical for this price segment. However, detailed specifications like resolution and peak brightness are missing. The focus here is on internal differences. The more efficient Snapdragon 680 in the Y21t could potentially allow for slightly better display brightness management, extending battery life during outdoor use, but this is speculative without display specs.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information beyond the presence of multiple lenses, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Oppo F19s might prioritize camera features slightly more. Both devices likely include a standard macro lens, which often delivers limited real-world benefit. The image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 680 of the Y21t is newer and potentially offers improved image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions, but this is dependent on software optimization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y21t’s Snapdragon 680 (6nm) is a significant upgrade over the Oppo F19s’ Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially reduced throttling during prolonged use. While both are octa-core CPUs with similar core configurations (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver vs 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver), the Snapdragon 680’s higher clock speeds and more efficient architecture provide a tangible performance boost in demanding applications and gaming. The Y21t will likely exhibit smoother multitasking and faster app loading times.
Battery Life
The Oppo F19s’ 33W wired charging is a clear advantage, claiming a 54% charge in 30 minutes. The vivo Y21t is limited to 18W charging, meaning a full charge will take considerably longer. However, the Snapdragon 680’s superior power efficiency could offset this difference in daily usage. The Y21t is likely to deliver longer screen-on time despite the slower charging speed. The Y21t also offers 2.5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the F19s, allowing it to top up accessories like earbuds.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y21t (India) if you need a phone that can handle everyday tasks smoothly and offers better long-term performance thanks to its more modern chipset. It’s ideal for users who value efficiency and don’t want to compromise on responsiveness. Buy the Oppo F19s if you prioritize extremely fast charging and are a light user who primarily focuses on basic smartphone functions like calls, messaging, and social media.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 680 in the vivo Y21t handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 680 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a consistently smooth experience. The 6nm process helps mitigate throttling, but sustained high frame rates may not be achievable. The Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo F19s will likely require lower settings.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Oppo F19s compared to the vivo Y21t in real-world use?
The Oppo F19s’ 33W charging can add approximately 54% charge in 30 minutes, while the vivo Y21t’s 18W charging will take significantly longer – likely over an hour to reach the same level. This makes the F19s ideal for users who need a quick top-up before leaving the house.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 680 in the vivo Y21t offer noticeable improvements in app loading times compared to the Snapdragon 662?
Yes, the Snapdragon 680’s newer architecture and higher clock speeds will result in faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. While the difference may not be dramatic for basic apps, it will be more noticeable with larger, more complex applications.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget smartphones offer limited image quality. They are often included for marketing purposes but rarely deliver truly detailed macro shots. Expect soft images with limited clarity.
