vivo Y21s vs. Motorola Moto G50 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing 5G connectivity and slightly better overall performance, the Motorola Moto G50 5G is the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 700 chipset, built on a more efficient 7nm process, offers a noticeable advantage in sustained performance and future-proofing, despite the Y21s' faster charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y21s | Motorola Moto G50 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Australia |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - Australia |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Australia |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 21 | 2021, August 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 21 | Available. Released 2021, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 167 x 76.4 x 9.3 mm (6.57 x 3.01 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~80.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 2.5W reverse wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Pearl White | Meteorite Grey |
| Models | V2110 | XT2149-1 |
| Price | - | About 170 EUR |
| SAR | 0.83 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y21s
- Faster 18W wired charging
- 2.5W reverse wired charging for accessories
- Potentially slightly better battery life with efficient usage
- Older 12nm Helio G80 chipset
- Less powerful CPU cores (Cortex-A75)
- Potentially lower sustained performance
Motorola Moto G50 5G
- More efficient 7nm Dimensity 700 chipset
- Faster CPU cores (Cortex-A76)
- Integrated 5G modem for better connectivity
- Better long-term performance potential
- Slower 15W wired charging
- No reverse wired charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Details regarding panel type (IPS vs AMOLED) and resolution are missing, suggesting both likely utilize standard LCD panels common in this price bracket. The focus here is on functionality rather than visual fidelity. Bezels are expected to be moderate on both, and color accuracy will likely be adequate but not exceptional. Without specific brightness data, it's difficult to declare a clear winner, but the Moto G50's larger screen size (typically found in this class) may offer a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both phones targeting the budget segment. Details on sensor sizes are unavailable, but both will likely feature a primary sensor paired with auxiliary lenses of limited utility (often 2MP macro or depth sensors). The aperture of the main lens will be a key determinant of low-light performance, but without that data, it's difficult to assess. Image processing will likely lean towards vibrant colors and boosted contrast to appeal to a wider audience. The Dimensity 700’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) may offer slightly better noise reduction and dynamic range, but the difference will likely be marginal.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G50 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700, fabricated on a 7nm process, is a significant step up from the vivo Y21s’ Mediatek Helio G80 (12nm). The 7nm node translates to better power efficiency and thermal management, allowing the Dimensity 700 to sustain peak performance for longer periods. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Dimensity 700 utilizes Cortex-A76 cores (2x2.2 GHz) which are architecturally superior to the Helio G80’s Cortex-A75 cores (2x2.0 GHz), resulting in faster single-core performance. This difference is noticeable in app launch times and overall system responsiveness. The G50's 5G modem is integrated into the chipset, offering a more streamlined and efficient 5G experience.
Battery Life
The battery capacity is not specified for either device, but typical capacities for this class are around 5000mAh. The vivo Y21s has a slight advantage with 18W wired charging compared to the Moto G50 5G’s 15W. This translates to potentially faster charging times, though the actual difference will depend on battery capacity and charging efficiency. The Dimensity 700’s superior power efficiency may offset the slower charging speed, resulting in comparable real-world battery life for moderate usage. The Y21s also includes 2.5W reverse wired charging, a niche feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y21s if you prioritize a slightly faster charging experience (18W vs 15W) and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media, calls, and light web browsing. Buy the Motorola Moto G50 5G if you want a more capable processor for occasional gaming, smoother multitasking, and the benefits of a more modern and efficient 5G chipset, making it a better long-term investment.