Looking for a reliable and affordable smartphone? The vivo Y21e and Oppo Reno5 F are popular contenders in the budget segment. But which one offers the best value for your money? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their features, performance, and overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno5 F edges out the vivo Y21e thanks to its faster charging, slightly better performance, and more modern design. However, the Y21e remains a solid choice for those prioritizing efficiency and a more budget-friendly price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 14 | 2021, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 14 | Available. Released 2021, March 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 160.1 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4310 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Diamond Glow | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple |
| Models | V2140 | CPH2217 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo Y21e
- Excellent battery life
- Efficient processor
- Affordable price
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower charging speed
- Less powerful processor
- Average camera performance
- Basic design
Oppo Reno5 F
- Faster charging (30W)
- Slightly better performance
- More stylish design
- Versatile camera system
- Older chipset
- Potentially shorter battery life than Y21e
- Higher price than Y21e
- 12nm process less efficient
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch display, but the Reno5 F likely has a slightly better panel with potentially more vibrant colors and better viewing angles. The Y21e's display is adequate for everyday use, but not exceptional. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo Reno5 F typically boasts a more versatile camera system, often including a higher resolution main sensor and potentially better image processing. The Y21e's camera is decent for casual photography, but lacks the Reno5 F's capabilities in low light or with complex scenes. Both likely have a 13MP front camera.
Performance
The Oppo Reno5 F's Helio P95 chipset, while older, generally outperforms the Snapdragon 680 in real-world usage, especially in multitasking and gaming. The Y21e's 6nm process offers better power efficiency, but the Reno5 F's CPU architecture provides a noticeable speed boost.
Battery Life
The vivo Y21e's Snapdragon 680 chipset and 6nm process contribute to excellent battery life. While both phones have similar battery capacities (around 5000mAh), the Y21e will likely last longer on a single charge. The Reno5 F's 30W charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the Y21e's 18W.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y21e is ideal for users who prioritize battery life and a smooth, basic experience for everyday tasks. The Oppo Reno5 F is a better fit for those who want faster charging, a more stylish design, and a slightly more powerful processor for occasional gaming or demanding apps.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Oppo Reno5 F generally offers a smoother gaming experience due to its slightly more powerful processor.
❓ Does the vivo Y21e support 5G?
No, both the vivo Y21e and Oppo Reno5 F are 4G devices.
❓ Which phone has faster charging?
The Oppo Reno5 F has significantly faster charging with its 30W charging support compared to the vivo Y21e's 18W.