The vivo Y21e and Motorola Moto G52 occupy a similar price bracket, both powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680. This comparison isn't about raw power – the chipset is identical – but about how each manufacturer optimizes around it, particularly in areas like charging speed and overall user experience. We'll dissect the nuances to determine which phone delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G52 emerges as the slightly better choice. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 680 chipset, the Moto G52’s 30W charging significantly reduces downtime, making it ideal for those constantly on the go. The vivo Y21e remains a viable option, but the charging difference is a key differentiator.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 14 | 2022, April 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 14 | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 160.1 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Diamond Glow | Charcoal Gray, Porcelain White |
| Models | V2140 | XT2221-1, XT2221-2 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 470 EUR |
vivo Y21e
- Potentially lower price point
- 2.5W reverse wired charging
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 efficiency
- Slower 18W charging
- Limited display information
Motorola Moto G52
- Faster 30W charging
- More convenient charging experience
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 efficiency
- Potentially higher price
- No reverse wired charging
Display Comparison
Both devices lack detailed display specifications in the provided data. However, given their price point, we can assume both utilize LCD panels. The absence of information regarding refresh rates suggests both likely operate at a standard 60Hz. The real-world impact will be similar viewing experiences, with neither offering the smoothness of higher refresh rate displays found in more expensive models. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on cost-effectiveness over premium aesthetics.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will heavily depend on image processing algorithms. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) suggests image stabilization will be primarily digital, potentially resulting in softer images in low-light conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and fixed focus.
Performance
The core of both the vivo Y21e and Motorola Moto G52 is the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver cores. This means performance will be virtually identical for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. The 6nm process node contributes to reasonable power efficiency, but sustained workloads may reveal thermal throttling. RAM configurations are not specified, but this will be a key factor in multitasking performance; more RAM will benefit the Moto G52.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn't specified, the key differentiator here is charging speed. The Motorola Moto G52 boasts 30W wired charging, a significant upgrade over the vivo Y21e’s 18W wired charging. This translates to substantially faster charging times – potentially reducing a full charge from over 2 hours on the Y21e to around 1 hour 15 minutes on the G52. The Y21e does offer 2.5W reverse wired charging, a niche feature for topping up accessories, but the G52’s faster charging is a more impactful benefit for the majority of users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y21e if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It's a solid choice for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks and don't mind topping up overnight. Buy the Motorola Moto G52 if you value faster charging and a more convenient user experience. This phone is better suited for users who need to quickly replenish their battery throughout the day and appreciate the added convenience of 30W wired charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 680 in the Moto G52 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 680 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The chipset isn't designed for high-end gaming, so don't anticipate a flagship-level experience. Thermal throttling may occur during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G52 with the 30W charger?
While a precise figure depends on the battery capacity (which isn't specified), the Moto G52’s 30W charging should fully charge the device in approximately 1 hour and 15 minutes to 1 hour and 30 minutes, significantly faster than the vivo Y21e.
❓ Is the 2.5W reverse charging on the vivo Y21e useful for anything?
The 2.5W reverse charging is primarily useful for topping up small accessories like Bluetooth earbuds or a smartwatch in an emergency. It's a very slow charging speed and won't significantly charge a larger device like another smartphone.
